OG-127的（1）代词指代及（2）定语从句的修饰对象

127. In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees' paychecks. assigned by them to the United Nations.

(A)  for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them

(B)  for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned

(C)  for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned

(D)  in place of their employees' paychecks, for those of them assigned

(E)  in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them

请问：（1）分号前后两个分句中分别出现的their指代并不相同，这是否违反“同一句子中指代必须一致”的原则？

            （2）另外正确答案B改成“for their employees' paychecks who have been assigned"之后还对不对？即对于M's N that...定语从句而言，that之后的内容能否跳过N而修饰M？

谢谢！

(B)  for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned

who是修饰employee的呀？gg

答案b的their和前面的their是不一致的，前面指servants，后面指 governments，但是两句句子中间有“；”隔开。有的时候是有违反这个一直原则的。不过不要太care，不是很多的这种情况。

我认为你的修改是不对的，who，which这种都是n就近指代的。按你这么改就变成修饰paychecks了，况且你n’s的用法没有n of n 的结构好

谢谢MM的及时回复！

关于定语从句的修饰对象，我还未能理解透。对于你所说的“who, which是就近修饰”，我觉得不妥。请看：OG-225：Minnesota is the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states where there is a sizable  population of wolves and where this predator remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep.

OG225说明，对于“M of N that..".结构，定从可以跳过N而修饰M。因此我想问的是，对于物主代词结构的"sb's  sth", 能否用"who......"的定从跳过“sth”从而达到限定“sb.”的目的。

谢谢！

最近越來是越搞不清定語從句該是如何修飾，這麼說吧

正確答案是(B)  for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned

我把他改成  for the paychecks of their employees having been assigned 或是

                   for the paychecks of their employees, who have been assigned

是我太沒信心了，終於找到結論了，謝謝LES版主

看來關鍵還是在限定還是非限定，看得出來，答案就出來了