ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3317|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文] argument174,作文练手,求拍!!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-11-20 14:49:00 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Argument  39\174     2011-11-20     9:53-11:53
太烂了,第一次写文章,拖了这么久才搞定一片,求拍!!!!求运气呀!!!!

A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer home-cooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about healthful eating. Therefore, the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion.
_________________________________________________________
In order to convince us that a new specializing in seafood restaurant will have a lot of customers and make a profit, the author shows a series of so-called reasons and evidences. In fact, this argument filled with assumptions is not strong enough to let us believe such a restaurant can have a market in Bay City.

Unfairly assuming the validity and accuracy of the recent sales study, the author attempts to demonstrate that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City has really increased. However, a study does not mean anything if we do not know what the exact consumption of seafood in the past four years is and what may influence the result of this study. For example, if there were only 10 dishes sold out five years ago and there also existed some fluctuation of seafood consumption in the past four years, so the 30 percent increase, namely 3 dishes increase, is just in normal range. Or even though the consumption of seafood is really larger than that before, maybe some vital information that restaurants have sales promotion including giving coupons, giving a discount and buy one get one free policy is concealed.

Additionally, the author implies that a seafood restaurant will be favored, because a nationwide study indicates that nowadays two-income families, which are major families in Bay City, do not like to cook at home and prefer healthy food. But the nationwide study cannot stand for the local families’ opinion in Bay City. Thus, we have little information about what they like to eat and whether they like to eat out. And even if they prefer eating out and healthy food, they do not necessarily go to eat seafood, let alone go to specializing in seafood restaurant for food. There are many other choices for them, such as vegetables and coarse food grain. Or for some seafood lovers, they also can cook seafood dishes at home since.

While it may be true that people in Bay City like eating seafood dishes in restaurant more and more, they do not have to go to a specializing in seafood restaurant. What’s more, we do not know the consumption of other dishes. Maybe the consumption of seafood dishes makes up a little proportion compared with other food dishes including pork, beef, chicken and vegetables. So a survey about people’s preference for a specializing in seafood restaurant should be made to assure that kind of restaurant can have a market. Meanwhile, the cost of running a restaurant should be considered so as to be quite profitable.

Given that this argument is not so cogent, we need more concrete and detailed evidence to examine the conclusion. If we have really made sure that a specializing in seafood restaurant can be favored and make a profit, it is a nice idea to set up a restaurant that specializes in seafood.


PS: 478字
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-20 15:01:06 | 只看该作者
肿么没有人给点儿建议呢?
板凳
发表于 2011-11-21 09:02:50 | 只看该作者
You have many great ideas, but it would look a lot more solid if you go a little deeper analyzing them.

For example, in the second paragraph, you mention an increase by 30% in seafood consumption might not be as big as the policy advocators want to believe.
Besides the fact that the survey does not provide the base year number, you can also suggest may be there is a slight increase of population in Bay City and led to the seafood consumption.
If other type of food consumption has increased by more than 30%, the preference of seafood overall has actually decreased because of the new immigrants.

Later you mentioned, double-income families might not necessarily want to go to seafood restaurant.
You can talk about how seafood is not necessarily healthy, and many fish meat is no longer consumable due to water pollution.
Moreover, people might also choose not go to go seafood restaurant for environmental concerns --> stop eating fish can help protect ocean ecological system.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-21 15:37:01 | 只看该作者
nice advice很牛呀~~~
5#
发表于 2011-11-22 12:22:03 | 只看该作者
不知道是不是要严格按照要求里的 “discuss what questions would need to be addressed”来写
例如在文章是时不时的出现question之类的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-23 21:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部