- UID
- 322630
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-3-5
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
30min远远不够,写的还是不够熟,哭。 然后我的第三个论点,写得有点像有谬误的argument。那个调查其实是我自己做过的,可是一个调查研究怎么能用几句话概括的天衣无缝呢(我又加了一句,调查被科学的方法证明是valid)。求高人指点。 字数:577
In today’s rapid development oftechnology, science and social life, we are in a desperate need ofwell-educated people. Ways to train students well at school have been widely undera long-term discussion. I admit that paying too much attention to high gradesis a method far from effective learning. However, competition for high grades,as a dominating form in many countries, has been playing a significant role inhelping with learning. Admittedly, learning quality might beseriously limited by competition for high grades when educators or students overemphasize the function of grades. The overstatement of high grades might evencause painful consequences. As we know, for example, in some Asian countrieswhere the competition for high grades is the most important way to get highereducation and better jobs, students are under great pressure. There must beseveral cases of suicides reported each year in China, Japan and Korea, for thehuge burdens of getting high grades that they could not deal with very well.The pursuing for high grades could have been a risk to the learners’ mentalhealth or even lives, not to mention how negative it is to the quality oflearning. Besides, moral problems such as cheating have also epidemic in someareas where high grade is the only focus at school. However, as a traditional method of evaluating,the requirement of good grades has its own merits. For instance, most Americanuniversities take SAT or GRE scores as a condition to admit students becausethey believe that the tests could to some degree evaluate the applicant’sability in learning. And it works. Under the clear guide of this developingevaluating system, students could work on the qualities they need to get highergrades. Learning qualities could also be improved with the clearer goal oflearning. Without a general consensus of evaluation system, it seems too hardto fairly arrange students into appropriate positions. Moreover, examination could be aneffective motivation to students when it is limited to a safe range, so as toimprove the quality of learning. This is especially true on the elementary (K-5)education levels. When I was an intern in a 2nd grade classroom, mymentor, a 2nd grade classroom teacher who was also taking courses ina graduate school, did an action research about the role tests play to motivatelearning. She gave a math test to a group of the students twice a week with atime limit. Two months later, this group of students got much higher gradesthan the control group, and they could finish their daily worksheets faster. 80%responses to questionnaires sent to parents of students who were in theexperiment group also showed that the weekly math tests motivated the students indoing their math homework in different degrees. Additionally, a few teachers inother grade levels all got similar results, which had also been proved to bevalid after being analyzed by a scientific method. According to the actionresearch, competition for high grades can contribute to a better learningquality by serving as a great motive to elementary students. In sum, as discussed above we could safelydraw the conclusion that competition for high grades serves as a double-edgesword in education. Appropriate grades competition is not only an effective wayof evaluating the learning abilities, it can also serve as a motivation ineducation. However, emphasizing purely on grades other than effective learning couldbe hazardous. |
|