ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4177|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文] I120 伟人成就-民生-强国 求拍

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-23 02:45:09 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Issue 120
Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people.
Writea response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1.    Many successful great people make contribution to the well-being of the citizens, therefore, their achievements can serve as a good indicator as a strong nation;
2.    Geniuses cannot portray a full picture---the elite only
3.    Achievements may not all target at boosting the well-being of people’s lives


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


What reflects a strong nation? Many things may serve as an indicator for a strong nation, like strong military power, good economics, high technologies, advanced civilizations and so forth. This issue considering that the achievement great people of a nation--the rulers, artists, or scientists--as a good indicator for its strength due to the boosting effect of these achievements to the good life of the people is valuable and sometimes may hold true, but I suppose in a broad sphere the successes of these great people may not be a good indicator.


The well-being of the people within a nation is definitely a good indicator for a strong nation. After all, the fundamental purpose of building a nation is to guarantee a good life for the citizens, and therefore a nation can never be called great if its people are suffering from poor famine and poverty. From this point, if the achievements of the great people can bring benefits to the people’s life, make a better living condition for them, then these achievements are for sure a mirror to a strong nation. For example, each revolution of technologies driven by scientists and inventers bring great change to our society: creating more power for production like DNA-transmission tech for productive farming, enriching the living content like Apple tech today. The rulers boost the nations with laws and policies, and the artists enrich people’s mental world by charming music and painting colors. Their achievements are definitely the symbol of a strong nation.


Although the successes created by these geniuses are great and valuable to the society, however, we cannot overweigh their successes so much as to believe only their successes and contributions can mirror whether a nation is strong or not. After all, the elite are just a tiny part of the whole society with a limited contribution to the glory of the whole society. Sometimes, their efforts may be too tiny to shift the nation’s fate of declining, like the work of those scholars with advanced knowledge in Old China. It is likely to witness some nations can be strong with few achievements from the great geniuses; also to view some nations become declined in spite of many great and talented achievements from the elite. In a word, the achievements of the elite may not always guarantee a nation strong.


Moreover, there is no guarantee that all the achievements from the great people are made to improve the well-being of the people in the nation. Some achievements may even act negatively. Sometimes we may detect some negative application of the creation by scientists or artists for an evil purpose. The nuclear weapon, for example, developed as a discovery of the nuclear physics brings a painful lesson to all human beings. Scientists like Einstein even regret to invent it. If the achievements fail to bring benefits but pains to our society, how can we say that they are a good indicator for a strong nation?


In sum, the achievements of the great people—the rulers, artists, or scientists—may be able to serve as a good indicator to a strong nation when they bring benefits to the well-being of the citizens. However, we should also view that the effort and successes done by the great cannot definitely guarantee a nation strong, and the achievements themselves may be not beneficial to our society at all, therefore requiring another indicator—the characters of the populace may be a better one.


575—40min (rushing the time, fail to apply that many examples and make it that fluent)
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-10-23 20:16:51 | 只看该作者
up下
板凳
发表于 2011-10-23 21:55:28 | 只看该作者
economics是经济学的意思吧、、、,经济状况用economy?
地板
发表于 2011-10-23 22:02:24 | 只看该作者
1、感觉第三段至少要有一个例子去证明吧?否则显得说服力不足啊
2、感觉语言还有很大的提升空间,比如说核武的那个例子,建议学学北美范文中相应的描述吧
3、爱因斯坦不是invent 核武,而是建立了质能方程——核武器的理论基础

加油哦!
5#
发表于 2011-10-24 10:19:56 | 只看该作者
基本立场是:
不可否认伟人政客对一个国家的影响力,但是普通大众的功劳也是不能忽视的。
前一个观点你有例子了,
普通大众,可以举出美国建立公路,铁路系统的例子。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-25 00:06:07 | 只看该作者
嗯嗯 ~ 应该纠正!谢谢
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-25 00:09:08 | 只看该作者
嗯 当时没想到什么顺手的例子——历史薄弱的我——就純理论套了~ 我搜集搜集,争取找到恰当的例子~ 语言确实还得提升,一旦赶着打字脑子里就剩下好少的词藻语句了~ 听你的,我去研究下北美范文!
我记得当初爱因斯坦等科学家对于原子弹的制造都抱有后悔之意,可能举他不够直接,还得查查资料验证才行~


谢谢G友!这么多建设性意见!获益良多!
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-25 00:40:46 | 只看该作者
嗯 有道理~ 当时没想到特别能直接体现民众起中流砥柱作用的好例子~ 公路铁路的兴建、基础设施的发展都源于大家的努力,这些也都毋庸置疑保障了人民生活的幸福,强国内涵的一部分~ 嗯 多谢提点啊!
9#
发表于 2011-11-1 01:41:44 | 只看该作者
1.觉得用broader更好,有点吹毛求疵了哈。but I suppose in a “broader" sphere the successes of these great people may not be a good indicator.不过总的说,你的这个一大句话我很喜欢。
2.同意第三段要细化的说法,觉得还可以使用抗日战争的说法~~会不会有点土
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-1 01:50:40 | 只看该作者
1.觉得用broader更好,有点吹毛求疵了哈。but I suppose in a “broader" sphere the successes of these great people may not be a good indicator.不过总的说,你的这个一大句话我很喜欢。
2.同意第三段要细化的说法,觉得还可以使用抗日战争的说法~~会不会有点土
-- by 会员 jameszhm (2011/11/1 1:41:44)



嗯~ 我再想想更好的例子~ 像别人说得前苏联解体的例子不错~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 08:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部