ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2814|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC资料] prep2-200 求NN看过来关于夹心修饰的问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-7-31 12:47:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Many financial experts believe that policy makers at the Federal Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future.
A. Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
B. Reserve, now viewing the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation and are
C. Reserve who, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
D. Reserve, who now view the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation, will be
E. Reserve, which now views the economy to be balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, is


答案选a。

that引导的从句policy makers at the Federal Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future.
问题是now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation这个放在这里不是夹心修饰吗?s,-ving, v+o.为什么ving向前做定语修饰policy makers而不是向后修饰are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future? 而且prep里的解释是“viewing做伴随”,还是不太懂。
                                
                        
               

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-8-1 00:00:12 | 只看该作者
楼主可以看看RON大神的解释

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/many-financial-experts-believe-that-policy-makers-t8474.html
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-8-1 09:29:03 | 只看该作者
emmahiggins09 发表于 2017-8-1 00:00
楼主可以看看RON大神的解释

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/many-financial-experts-believe- ...

看过啦,不过他说的没涉及到我的疑问我才发帖的
地板
发表于 2017-8-1 22:02:05 | 只看该作者
neinei11 发表于 2017-8-1 09:29
看过啦,不过他说的没涉及到我的疑问我才发帖的

RON的帖子里是没有将夹心的修饰因为这种说法是不太科学的。但是RON有一块一块仔细的分析题目和选项,看完之后楼主应该意识到,夹心修饰不是问题,句意才是关键呀。

楼主加油,我也走过这种弯路。夹心修饰与否这种形式是对我个人来说没啥大的用处,做到最后还是句意至上。
5#
发表于 2017-8-1 22:05:47 | 只看该作者
modifier 的修饰是用就近原理的,这里comma viewing 会向后修饰呢。

退一万步说,Ving 在句首的时候是向后修饰,那这个时候Ving 相后修饰的部分也不是是人而不是 are almost certain to. Viewing 动作的发出者必须要是人把,你向后修饰 are almost 巴拉巴拉你的动作发出这在哪里? 还是我没理解你的意思?
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2017-8-2 10:38:14 | 只看该作者
emmahiggins09 发表于 2017-8-1 22:05
modifier 的修饰是用就近原理的,这里comma viewing 会向后修饰呢。

退一万步说,Ving 在句首的时候是向后 ...

向后修饰,后面的句子的主语也是policy maker啊。夹心修饰在og的解释里有出现的,我忘了他们怎么称呼了。我想了一下大概知道为什么不能向后修饰了,因为这里的viewing引导的逻辑上不能做 policy makers are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future(主系表结构)的伴随或结果状语,所以只能作定语向前修饰了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 12:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部