ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Written in ink or engraved by stylus, more than 2,000 letters and documents on wooden tablets excavated at the site of the old roman fort at vindolanda in northern England are yielding a historical account of the military garrison in the first and second centuries that are so vivid in their details about personal life as they are from Pompeii.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 6856|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

已Search过,但没找到满意答案。GWD32-Q2(GWD TN-21-01)。NN来帮我解释下可否?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-2 06:37:23 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Q1:GWD32-Q2
Written in ink or engraved by stylus, more than 2,000 letters and documents on wooden tablets excavated at the site of the old roman fort at vindolanda in northern England are yielding a historical account of the military garrison in the first and second centuries that are so vivid in their details about personal life as they are from Pompeii

A.    are so vivid in their details about personal life as they ate
B.    are as vivid in their details of personal life as those gathered
C.    is as vivid in their detail about personal life as that gathered
D.    is as vivid in its details of personal life as that gathered
E.    is so vivid in its details of personal life as is that

答案在B和D中有争议。这道题目的Subject是more than 2,000 letters and documents 还是a historical account of the military garrison?

如果是前者,这个谓语are是不是离Subject太远了?
如果是后者, a historical account of the military garrison可以be gathered吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-2 07:12:25 | 只看该作者
D, yes it can be gathered.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-2 09:05:51 | 只看该作者
D, yes it can be gathered.
-- by 会员 redhead (2010/5/2 7:12:25)


make sense.thx~^^
地板
发表于 2010-5-2 09:06:39 | 只看该作者
句子主干:More than 2,000 letters and documents are yielding a historical account. 争论就是that从句是否修饰对象究竟是谁。理论上,GMAT中修饰部分应该紧靠修饰对象,定语从句有的时候可以通过单复数来实现跨越式修饰,比如:He is the only one of the seven students who has ever been to the United States. 后面的从句显然是跨过了students修饰前面的单数only one,但是能紧跟的时候应该紧跟。

所以,这道题account是可以被gathered修饰的,因此that从句应该是修饰最近的account,全部是单数修饰,因此选d.

如果要修饰复数主语,应该插入语到主语后面直接修饰,比如More than 2,000 letters and documents, as vivid in their detals..., are yielding a historical account...这样比较符合GMAT语法习惯。

Hope it helps ~~~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-2 09:24:42 | 只看该作者
句子主干:More than 2,000 letters and documents are yielding a historical account. 争论就是that从句是否修饰对象究竟是谁。理论上,GMAT中修饰部分应该紧靠修饰对象,定语从句有的时候可以通过单复数来实现跨越式修饰,比如:He is the only one of the seven students who has ever been to the United States. 后面的从句显然是跨过了students修饰前面的单数only one,但是能紧跟的时候应该紧跟。

所以,这道题account是可以被gathered修饰的,因此that从句应该是修饰最近的account,全部是单数修饰,因此选d.

如果要修饰复数主语,应该插入语到主语后面直接修饰,比如More than 2,000 letters and documents, as vivid in their detals..., are yielding a historical account...这样比较符合GMAT语法习惯。

Hope it helps ~~~
-- by 会员 MollyDong (2010/5/2 9:06:39)



谢谢Molly.其实我对于

A of B,that……
A's B,that……
A for B,that……
逗号后的that所修饰的成分很疑惑。查了CD前辈很多关于这方面内容的帖子,真可是众说纷纭啊。

最后的归纳总结是:如果语法和逻辑不可以判断的话,就得用其他方法来判断。
比如:
164. Thecommission proposed that funding for the park's development, which could beopen to the public early next year, is obtained through a local bond issue.
(B)that funding for development of the park, which could be open tothe public early next year, be

(E)developmentfunding for thepark, which couldbe open to the public early next year, is to be

Choice B is best.Choice A attaches the relative clause which could be open ... to thenoun development, when, in fact, it is the park that could beopen. Choice C omits that, the object of proposed that is neededto introduce the clause describing the proposal. C also uses to beunidiomatically where be is correct: the commission proposed [that] funding... to be obtained is wrong. Choice D incorrectly uses perhaps open tothe public ... to modify development; the phrase should modify park.Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning,says that the commission proposed development funding and that suchfunding could be open to the public ....

e是主谓宾结构,which优先修饰宾语
当然,主+谓+宾,that结构和插入语或同位语中出现的that,又是另外一种需要区分的情况了。


总之,很混乱哪。
6#
发表于 2010-8-22 11:47:00 | 只看该作者
E为什么不对呢?分不清什么时候要用倒装的is that,什么时候不需要这个动词;没有gathered句子好像也说的通
7#
发表于 2010-8-24 22:00:45 | 只看该作者
顶下,希望NN解答
8#
发表于 2010-9-4 15:16:56 | 只看该作者
还有个问题,D选项里是that而B选项里面是those,这样子不会有特定指代之嫌么?
9#
发表于 2010-9-18 16:08:36 | 只看该作者
同问E选项,迷茫比较形式的后半部分到底啥时候加动词,啥时候不加喃?我以为gathered在原句中没体现,应该不对>_<  请NN赐教啊!!
10#
发表于 2010-10-6 20:16:42 | 只看该作者
gathered 应该是historical account ,
因为庞贝不一定挖出了more than 2,000 letters and documents ……
是说神马火山喷发让庞贝被保存的很好,所以historical account 很赞啦……
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 19:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部