ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Marconi's conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating with a large, public audience.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1302|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Prep 171 代词问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-5-1 12:26:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
171
Marconi's conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating with a large, public audience.
A. Marconi's conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is
B. Marconi conceived of the radio as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, but which is
C. Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become
D. Marconi conceived of the radio to be a tool for private conversation, a substitute for the telephone, which has become
E. Marconi conceived of the radio to be a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, other than what it is,

其他选项都明白排除点了,就是不理解正确选项C中it指代radio这点。逻辑上确实it是指radio,但是为何没有就近指代telephone的歧义呢?而且两个分句也不是主从句,radio也不是第一个句子的主语。离得如此远,为何可以这样指代呢?

求NN们指点!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-5-1 19:58:13 | 只看该作者
不排除有指代telephone 的嫌疑,但是句子逻辑清楚,manhattan也说了,轻度的pronoun ambiguity是允许的
板凳
发表于 2013-5-2 09:22:34 | 只看该作者
我只能说,请注意分号的使用,分号前后两个句子相对独立,所以后一句的作主语的代词显然指代前一句的主语或核心名词,这里it显然不能指代人名Marconi,那么就应该优先指代核心词the radio。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 12:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部