ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2445|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

885-D- 20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-21 18:25:00 | 只看该作者

885-D- 20

20.         The argument that the dominant form of family structure today is not the nuclear family, but rather it is a family which is modified and extended, is based on a number of facts: the existence of three-generational families, the amount of vertical and horizontal communication between family subunits, and the extent to which family members offer assistance to one another.


(A) family, but rather it is a family which is modified and extended, is based on a number of facts: the existence of three-generational families


(B) family, but is instead a family that is modified and extended, is based on a number of facts: three-generational families exist


(C) family, which has been modified and extended, is based on a number of facts: the existence of three-generational families


(D) family but a modified extended family is based on a number of facts: the existence of three-generational families


(E) family, but also a modified and extended family, is based on a number of facts: three-generational families exist


D中is是否多余?modified是否修饰extended family ,那么是否应用副词形式?


谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-3-22 00:15:00 | 只看该作者
     is怎么可能多余???那是谓语部分啊!!


    

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-27 23:22:00 | 只看该作者
我理解的句子结构是the dominant form of family structure today is not the nuclear family but a modified extended family based on


是一个not but句型,其中the nuclear family和a modified extended family 并列,based on修饰前面的短语,这样我就解释不来为什么要加is了.


还有一个问题就是modified是否修饰extended family ,那么是否应用副词形式?


谢谢!

地板
发表于 2004-3-28 00:19:00 | 只看该作者

1.The argument that is not sth but sth is based on bla bla bla.fficeffice" />


2.A new pink shirt,难道new修饰pink吗? 同样,难道modified修饰extend吗? 只不过2个形容词不在同一个层次上而已,但2个形容词还是都修饰名词或名词短语的.


    

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-28 13:54:00 | 只看该作者
god god god!


how stupid am I !!!

6#
发表于 2004-3-28 14:18:00 | 只看该作者
You can't say you are stupid, you can only conclude that ETS    has to be intricate and     insidious. After all, GMAT is oriented at native American, so ETS can only distinguish the outstanding from the mediocre by these complex subjects. Most of the native American would    be frustrated by GMAT, not to say non-native American.

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-7 19:21:00 | 只看该作者

i see!

3q

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-24 19:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部