A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980. (A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times (B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times (C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio (D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio (E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times 我觉得A B的错误就是 错在 XX times+sth. 少了 sth. 少了后面的比较对象 老帖子有说A B 比较对象不对等 （前面是 pay 后面是 ratio） 可CEO挣的是白领的419倍 不就是一个比率吗 -- by 会员 339215262 (2011/7/9 0:06:36)
我觉得AB 确实是比较不对等，compare的一方是（蓝领工人419倍的）工资数，而不是你所认为的“CEO挣的是白领的419倍”这句话。按照你的理解，compare的两方就是句子和名词了，是不是违反了比较对象的平行？
open to discussion | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-7-9 00:06:36
收藏
收藏
楼主
