ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6975|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG50 狂疑惑, 请NN指点.

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-22 16:09:00 | 只看该作者

OG50 狂疑惑, 请NN指点.

50. As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500. or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.


(A)  As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.


(B)  A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult


(C)  As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult


(D)  A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.


(E)   As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500.



答案D. 我现在很晕


1) with应该有可能是就近修饰. 这样岂不是指代womb吧, 那么就是歧义么?


2) with 应该是强调一部分的人, 而不是所有的人吧. 可是这是客观事实啊, 这里怎么可以用WITH呢? (同样一道题, 象OG141)


141. Unlike transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same, all patients receiving hearts or other organs must take antirejection drugs for the rest of their lives.


(A)  Unlike transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same


(B)  Besides transplants involving identical twins with the same genetic endowment


(C)  Unless the transplant involves identical twins, who have the same genetic endowment


(D)  Aside from a transplant between identical twins with the same genetic endowment


(E)   Other than transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same



In B and D the expression identical twins with the same genetic endowment wrongly suggests that only some identical twin pairs are genetically identical

沙发
发表于 2004-10-22 17:08:00 | 只看该作者

1) with应该有可能是就近修饰. 这样岂不是指代womb吧, 那么就是歧义么?

是 a  baby with...

2) In B and D the expression identical twins with the same genetic endowment wrongly suggests that only some identical twin pairs are genetically identical

我想是你理解错了,这里说B和D的错误确实是在于它们把原概念做了不恰当的限制。但并不是因为用了with,而是句子结构,把非限制性定语变成了限制性的定语,改了原句意思。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-22 17:19:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢 stellate

还有人可以回答我的问题么?

地板
发表于 2004-10-22 17:59:00 | 只看该作者

141中应该是至少是可以理解为with的就近修饰,从而造成了逻辑错误的限定修饰,但同时也产生了歧义理解。

50中如果按就近修饰很难理解,womb 如何能with a rudimentary sense of vision呢?所以不可能造成歧义;而应该如stellate所说的a baby..with...

所以我的理解是,定语(包括with)的是否就近修饰还是应该从全句的语义来理解修饰层次,而不应死板的套用。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-22 18:49:00 | 只看该作者

David讲的有道理. 看来逻辑还是重点.

另外一点, OG50, 我觉得这是客观事实. 应该是所有的刚出生的BABY都有同样的视力. 所以我觉得这里用with不对.

谁能指点一下.

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-22 23:17:00 | 只看该作者

up

7#
发表于 2004-11-10 16:45:00 | 只看该作者
ding~~
8#
发表于 2004-11-11 05:18:00 | 只看该作者

141 with引导短语就近修饰twins, 此题考点限定非限定,即修饰范围大小。字面意思:还有一部分twins without the same genetic endowment

50  with 引导短语不是修饰baby, 而是修饰 emerges ;换句话说可能更好理解,婴儿出生的那一瞬间是有 a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500,并不是说作为baby的整个阶段都具备此特性。

NN指教!

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-4 11:17:00 | 只看该作者
50. summersmile讲的有道理
10#
发表于 2005-5-21 11:25:00 | 只看该作者
同一summersimle。with在这里表伴随
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 01:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部