ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2894|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD21-Q10 小疑惑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-5-4 20:45:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of humanancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.



A.it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who

B.it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors

C.appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors

D.appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors

E.appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who
OA: D

我是这样理解D选项的:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors....

蓝色部分what appears...是一个名词从句作为spears被发现的地方,而红色部分stunning evidence...是修饰spears的
然后问题来了,红色部分的修饰语和被修饰对象spears隔了很这么远,并且中间还有一个名词lakeshore hunting ground,不会有歧义吗?可以这么用吗?

希望各位CDers解惑呀~~
谢谢咯~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-5 19:54:10 | 只看该作者
自己顶!!!
板凳
发表于 2015-8-21 10:56:02 | 只看该作者
估计不会有人看到了,,,stunning evidence做同位语,stunning是形容词,=surprising
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-17 00:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部