ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2160|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于only位置是否可以移动的问题,以大全137为例

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-11-13 11:56:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
1.As Russell Banks suggests, it is a lack of grand ideas that have only left writers with semiotics, hermeneutics, and deconstruction.

(A) As Russell Banks suggests, it is a lack of grand ideas that have only left writers with

(B) Writers, Russell Banks suggests, who lack of grand ideas and leave only

(C) Russell Banks suggests that a lack of grand ideas has left writers with only

(D) It is Russell Banks’ suggestion that a lack of grand ideas have left writers only withC

(E) It is only a lack of grand ideas, Russell Banks suggests, which leave writers with


C项中的only位置与原文不同,这让我生生的排除掉了该选项。此处only的移动有没有产生意思上的改变?又是分别修饰的哪个部分?遇到only真是头大。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-11 07:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部