ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6206|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TONY 请教OG 37

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-5-2 22:08:00 | 只看该作者

TONY 请教OG 37

37. While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously [u]
(only if it would be taught as a separately required course).[/u]

A.    only if it would be taught as a separately required course
B.    only if it is taught as a separate, required course
C.    if it is taught only as a course required separately
D.    if it was taught only as a separate and required course
E.    if it would only be taught as a required course, separately
Choice B is best: in sentences expressing a conditional result (x will happen if y happens), the verb of the main clause should be in the future tense and the verb of the if clause should be in the present indicative. Thus, is taught (in B) is consistent with will take, whereas would be taught (in A and E) and was taught (in D) are not. For clarity, only in C, D, and E should immediately precede the entire if clause that it is meant to modify. Also, the intended meaning is distorted when the adverb separately is used to modify required, as in A and C, or taught, as in E; B correctly uses the adjective separate to modify course.
本题的正确的答案是B,但是我觉得B在separate, required 之间加一个and才合适,,难道两个形容词并列不需要加and吗?
为何在这儿用了一个逗号呢?是不是separate, required course 等于separate and required course呢?
沙发
发表于 2003-5-3 08:33:00 | 只看该作者
这个细节你抠的太细了。这里的“,”相当与and,用and也可以。
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-5-3 8:39:28编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2003-5-3 12:16:00 | 只看该作者
两个形容词并列,可以加逗号.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-5-3 14:06:00 | 只看该作者
哦,原来都可以,我总觉得加and的好,差一点排除这个选型!
现在明白
5#
发表于 2003-5-3 19:26:00 | 只看该作者
TONY,要考虑做题顺序的优先级,不能因为没有逗 号就排除选 项。
6#
发表于 2005-8-4 16:53:00 | 只看该作者

我还以为此TONY是那个800分的大N呢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 01:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部