Gemj 斑竹,885-12-12,谢谢

rabbitbug · 发表于 2003-12-1 15:56:00

12. Although all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live, Soviet audiences have seen a great deal of coverage.
(A) all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live
(B) all the Communist party conference’s Moscow proceedings were not carried live
(C) all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have not been carried alive
(D) not all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have been carried alive
(E) not all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were carried live
我选A, 可答案是E,如果选E,原句的意思不就变了吗?A 和E其他的语法没有任何不同之处, 为什么呢?

gemj · 发表于 2003-12-1 16:45:00

根据后半句soviet audiences have seen a great deal of coverage可知，会议的一部分内容还是报道了的。所以肯定不是所有的都没有报道。
而应该是“并非全部的议程都报道”。
但我记得“All... not”的结构也是部分否定。请有时间的大牛帮查查语法书，感谢！

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-12-1 16:45:27编辑过]

rabbitbug · 发表于 2003-12-1 17:03:00

感谢Gemj版主. 我想恐怕ETS自己也不会在这么深的语法上面做文章, 这里还是根据全部否定和部分否定来区分吧.

tianwan · 发表于 2004-4-8 20:37:00

No, structure "all.... do not ...." means part negation too. Yet it is a structure likely to confuse readers, so modern English discourages using this kind of structure. In the chapter of negation in any grammar book, you can find introduction of this structure. If complete negation is desired, then use "no, none, nobody,nothing,nowhere,neither, never".

Remember, in any case, when "all, both, every,everybody,every day, everyone, many,always, often etc" are used with "not", the negation is only part negation, wherever the position of "all, both etc".

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-8 20:38:18编辑过]

lotery · 发表于 2004-4-8 20:59:00

The Forbidden City in Beijing, from which the emperors ruled by heavenly mandate, was a site which a commoner or foreigner could not enter without any permission, on pain of death.

(A) which a commoner or foreigner could not enter without any permission,

(B) which a commoner or foreigner could enter without any permission only

(C) which no commoner or foreigner could enter without permission,

(D) which, without permission, neither commoner or foreigner could only enter,

(E) which, to enter without permission, neither commoner or foreigner could do,

顺便问同一个section的第5题
(a)(c)的差别到底是什么? 是no休饰的对象影响句意吗 .. 谢谢

tony6 · 发表于 2004-7-12 21:58:00

以下是引用tianwan在2004-4-8 20:37:00的发言：

No, structure "all.... do not ...." means part negation too. Yet it is a structure likely to confuse readers, so modern English discourages using this kind of structure. In the chapter of negation in any grammar book, you can find introduction of this structure. If complete negation is desired, then use "no, none, nobody,nothing,nowhere,neither, never".

Remember, in any case, when "all, both, every,everybody,every day, everyone, many,always, often etc" are used with "not", the negation is only part negation, wherever the position of "all, both etc".

不愧为780的超牛，解释地象OG。

jamesyeah · 发表于 2005-8-11 14:01:00

根据以上各楼的说法，A不也是部分否定吗？那为什么不能选呢？

nijiz · 发表于 2006-9-24 12:37:00

我觉得这题A说的意思是 "尽管所有的会议进程都没有实时转播(carried alive)，苏联人民还是看到了很多关于会议的报导".

E的意思是"尽管不是所有的会议进程都有实时转播, 苏联人民还是看到了很多关于会议的报导".

如果这样解释, A不通么?

小小亚述 · 发表于 2006-10-11 11:34:00

如果真研究得这么深,AE两个答案不是一样吗?怎样区分? A错在哪里?

希望有NN能来指教一下!

asupls · 发表于 2007-5-13 17:21:00

难道这道题目只能用all ... not这个结构容易引起歧义，所以不优选来排除吗？

请NN请教！！！谢谢

本贴相关题目 Other (UGUA)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

Gemj 斑竹,885-12-12,谢谢

Gemj 斑竹,885-12-12,谢谢

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()