以下是引用deedeexoxo在2008-6-17 16:08:00的发言: 为什么evidence 后面不加"that"也对呢?怎么排出其他是错的呢?谢谢! A recent study of ancient clay deposits has provided new evidence supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago. (A) supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that (B) supporting the theory that global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact (C) that supports the theory of global forest fires that were ignited by a meteorite impact and that (D) in support of the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact and that (E) of support for the theory of a meteorite impact that ignited global forest fires and evidence做宾语从句时候,是直接加that。。that后面的内容只是对evidence的补充。。that没实质的意思。 按照这里的5个选项,明显显示后面support是修饰证据evidence的,做定语的,用ing形式。。 首先看A:the theory of 强调的是名词,不是一个叙说的事情。。that直接在impact,修饰错误。。 B,正确。。the theory that 表示补充说明,用句子表示强调动作。。contribute直接修饰fires。 C:第一个that指代evidence表示定语从句,support和contribute并列。主语都是evidence。。逻辑乱掉。X D:第二个that是定语从句,有实际的指代意义,但是在句子上和第一个that并列,第一个that是没有意义的指代。。 E:that修饰错误,这里可以说修饰impact。。 |