ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1894|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

探讨gigi的in>and>of理论。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-28 08:12:00 | 只看该作者

探讨gigi的in>and>of理论。

15.   Acid rain and snow result from the chemical reactions between industrial emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides with atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids.


(A) with atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids


(B) with atmospheric water vapor producing highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids


(C) and atmospheric water vapor which has produced highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids


(D) and atmospheric water vapor which have produced sulfuric and nitric acids which are highly corrosive E


(E) and atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids


按照gigi的理论,这里的the chemical reactions between industrial emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides 很容易被理解成the chemical reactions between (industrial emissions of sulfur dioxide) and  (nitrogen oxides)......而其实这里应该是the chemical reactions between industrial emissions of (sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides)...... 所以我觉得作题时还是得结合逻辑意思和实际情况(比如这题得结合固定搭配between...and 来考虑)才能判断清楚 A of B的归属问题.大家觉得呢?


请指教.

沙发
发表于 2004-5-28 08:54:00 | 只看该作者

同意!!有同感~~~

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-28 09:10:00 | 只看该作者
昨天看了gigi 的一番讲解,颇为佩服,还以为因此可以彻底攻克一大SC难题....今天再结合实际例子演练演练,感觉又被打回了原形.....颇为居丧....看来SC还是以理解逻辑意思为重啊...
地板
发表于 2004-5-28 12:57:00 | 只看该作者
同意!个人感觉考试时仅凭语法知识就能做出的题少之又少。
5#
发表于 2004-5-28 13:22:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用juan在2004-5-28 9:10:00的发言:
昨天看了gigi 的一番讲解,颇为佩服,还以为因此可以彻底攻克一大SC难题....今天再结合实际例子演练演练,感觉又被打回了原形.....颇为居丧....看来SC还是以理解逻辑意思为重啊...

I have the same feeling

6#
发表于 2004-5-28 14:12:00 | 只看该作者

仔细琢磨,只追求语法结构的正确,而不注意句子意思的正确,本身就是的舍本逐末哦~~~~~语法不过是建立语意的基础而已~~RIGHT?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 13:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部