The Iroquois were primarily planters, but supplementing their cultivation of maize, squash, and beans with fishing and hunting. (A) but supplementing (B) and had supplemented (C) and even though they supplemented (D) although they supplemented (E) but with supplementing
The Iroquois were primarily planters,这里面的were是系动词。 而but the Iroquois were supplementing这里面的were是助动词 两个were功能不同,不可共用,即后面那个不可以省略。而且就算这么补了,时态确实也不对。 -------- 另外A,E里面用了supplementing和with supplementing如果本意是想表示伴随,但是前面是主系表结构,而且supplementing和with supplementing前面各自都有连词,所以不可能做伴随状语。故,错误。
OG解释:The logic of the sentence also argues against a construction that would set the two clauses and the importance of their content equal when they clearly should not be. 我的理解是,既然根据句子表达的意思,2个句子逻辑上和重要性都不能是平等关系,那么只能是一个句子是重点。用ALTHOUGH是让步关系,句子的重点在第一个句子上,这点没问题,但是用BUT,表示转折关系,重点应该是在第二个句子上吧,这也满足重点在一个句子上的要求啊?
The Iroquois were primarily planters,这里面的were是系动词。 而but the Iroquois were supplementing这里面的were是助动词 两个were功能不同,不可共用,即后面那个不可以省略。而且就算这么补了,时态确实也不对。 -------- 另外A,E里面用了supplementing和with supplementing如果本意是想表示伴随,但是前面是主系表结构,而且supplementing和with supplementing前面各自都有连词,所以不可能做伴随状语。故,错误。
OG解释:The logic of the sentence also argues against a construction that would set the two clauses and the importance of their content equal when they clearly should not be. 我的理解是,既然根据句子表达的意思,2个句子逻辑上和重要性都不能是平等关系,那么只能是一个句子是重点。用ALTHOUGH是让步关系,句子的重点在第一个句子上,这点没问题,但是用BUT,表示转折关系,重点应该是在第二个句子上吧,这也满足重点在一个句子上的要求啊?