ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1907|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一提真题,请教一下

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-17 21:16:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A recent study of ancient clay deposits has provided new evidence supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.
(A) supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that
(B) supporting the theory that global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact
(C) that supports the theory of global forest fires that were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
(D) in support of the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
(E) of support for the theory of a meteorite impact that ignited global forest fires and

白勇说:that contributed to the extinction of。。。修饰的是global forest fires,就近原则不是应该修饰a meteorite impact?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-17 21:22:09 | 只看该作者

答案是B

难道答案是B就能说明contributedto the extinction of修饰的是global forest fires吗?global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact contributed to theextinction of。。。这样的句子不可以认为contributedto the extinction of修饰的是a meteorite impact吗?
板凳
发表于 2010-12-18 00:07:16 | 只看该作者
一楼的问题没看懂,说的是原句吗?that 指代肯定是模糊的,不清晰;另外逻辑含义也不对,theory怎么能导致灭忙呢?

B选项,二楼你理解有点问题
global forest fires( ignited by a meteorite impact )contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.
你看看这个句子,这个句子主语是global forest fires, 括号内部分是后置定语修饰前者面的global forest fires; 而contributed to 是谓语
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-18 22:41:06 | 只看该作者
一楼的问题没看懂,说的是原句吗?that 指代肯定是模糊的,不清晰;另外逻辑含义也不对,theory怎么能导致灭忙呢?

B选项,二楼你理解有点问题
global forest fires( ignited by a meteorite impact )contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.
你看看这个句子,这个句子主语是global forest fires, 括号内部分是后置定语修饰前者面的global forest fires; 而contributed to 是谓语
-- by 会员 mudiduange (2010/12/18 0:07:16)




兄弟啊,一楼二楼四楼都是我啦!
“global forest fires( ignited by a meteorite impact )contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.”
只是我截出来的啊,不是一个主谓结构,你把这句话放在原题里看一下再分析哎!谢谢!
5#
发表于 2010-12-19 00:08:36 | 只看该作者
哪里不明白呢,我已经分析了,就是这么个结构呀
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-16 23:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部