ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1438|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

XDF套题-S12-T20 疑问

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-26 19:07:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
20.    In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

The answer is D.

Sb. pay sth. for having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected.
这里with their odometers disconnected 作定语
那么A的问题在哪里?A中的with their odometers disconnected是做什么成分,对于pay  more than $16 million  for   cars (that were )这样的结构是否正确?是不是A主要问题是that 从句后面并没有强调出“没能和计程器连接上”这个重心意思。反正我不是很明确A是否表达出这个意思。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-26 19:17:05 | 只看该作者
pay for sth 是为某物支付价格
pay for doing 是为赔偿所支付的意思
这里应该用pay for doing的形式符合逻辑意思所以在DE 中出
D比E好因为D是短语修饰 E是that从句修饰
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-26 19:48:31 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上~
那难道短语修饰优于that从句修饰?
我觉得E的句子是不是有语法错误。如果仅仅是cars被从句修饰,have cars that....肯定不对;
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部