ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 12259|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新prep1-201

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-9 15:55:00 | 只看该作者

新prep1-201

201.
            
(25167-!
-item-!-188;#058&001486)     (GWD30-Q4)

 

The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor's unqualifying support. 

A. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support

B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor

C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor

D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor

E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor

 

1.想问这里的D为什么不对 想不明白为什么不能说 support by labor;

 

2.而且句子里面也没有明显的现在完成时特征 为什么用完成时态

 

谢谢大家帮我解答

沙发
发表于 2009-2-9 17:11:00 | 只看该作者

先试回答LZ问题:

1)D的明显问题就是将本来修饰receive的consistently转变成了support的定语,违背愿意。

2)从逻辑意义上说,三位女士一直都得到support,这个support过去就有,并且一直持续到现在,“liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection”这个部分的动词是现在式,与主句使用现在完成时并无矛盾。

此题试分析如下:

A. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support --unqualifying词义错误

B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor --are receiving 事态错误(易受consistently的影响),unqualifying词义错误

C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor --correct

D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor --解释见上。

E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor--解释同B和D

请指正。

 

板凳
发表于 2009-2-9 17:39:00 | 只看该作者
摸摸LZ,我觉得这里support是不可用by的。他表示来自于最好用from,of就差一点,也说的过去。

当然不是说support就不能用by. 要看ETS怎么样构造,句法结构。eg. We give support by email.

ETS蛮喜欢恶心认得,把某种用法上非常idiomatic的结构,抽出来放在另一个句子中,让我们选错。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-9 17:46:00 | 只看该作者

这么说似乎有点体会到by的意思

5#
发表于 2009-2-10 14:37:00 | 只看该作者
同意,consistently不能与现在进行时搭配.
6#
发表于 2009-2-10 14:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用balabaladou7在2009-2-9 17:11:00的发言:

先试回答LZ问题:

1)D的明显问题就是将本来修饰receive的consistently转变成了support的定语,违背愿意。

2)从逻辑意义上说,三位女士一直都得到support,这个support过去就有,并且一直持续到现在,“liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection”这个部分的动词是现在式,与主句使用现在完成时并无矛盾。

此题试分析如下:

A. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support --unqualifying词义错误

B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor --are receiving 事态错误(易受consistently的影响),unqualifying词义错误

C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor --correct

D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor --解释见上。

E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor--解释同B和D

请指正。

 

很赞。

恩,同意D里面的错误不是时态,而是consistent变成了形容词,改变句意了..by用在被动语态里后面才跟行为者.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-10 14:42:12编辑过]
7#
发表于 2009-7-13 01:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用焰焰的男朋友在2009-6-3 14:08:00的发言:
请问consistently不能与现在进行时搭配吗??

同问。为什么consistently不能与现在进行时搭配??

8#
发表于 2009-8-4 00:56:00 | 只看该作者
因为consistently表示一贯的,用现在完成时表示从过去到现在,正好有一贯以来的意思。而现在进行时表示现在正在做什么,不能表达一贯这个含义。个人浅见
9#
发表于 2010-8-1 22:09:56 | 只看该作者
因为consistently表示一贯的,用现在完成时表示从过去到现在,正好有一贯以来的意思。而现在进行时表示现在正在做什么,不能表达一贯这个含义。个人浅见
-- by 会员 zhengjingzhe (2009/8/4 0:56:00)



我认为receive和reach,go,leave等词一样是不可持续动词,是瞬间动词,不能用现在进行时。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 18:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部