ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1469|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急问!下周考!which/that跳跃修饰or修饰不当的判断标准

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-31 22:13:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


  1. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
  2. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
  3. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering
  4. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
  5. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

    今天又碰到这题了,第一次做并没有觉得which有什么问题,但这次看到which跟着Dickinson我就当修饰不当给排除了,最后又返回去选了个不太合逻辑的A。
    看到答案是E,我就困惑了,这里which可以跳跃修饰letters,那么到底什么情况下是跳跃修饰,什么情况下这样的跳跃又是不可接受的,算修饰不当呢??

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-31 22:36:00 | 只看该作者
弱弱的说一句~~我个人认为 这道题不选A是因为后面的outnumbering逻辑主语出现歧义吧。。。跳跃修饰觉得只要不引起混淆就可以了,能成为were written 主语的在之前提到的名词中只有letter 而那个人不可能做were written 的主语 因此不会产生歧义~~个人感觉~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 18:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部