ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1850|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全220

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-14 01:38:00 | 只看该作者

大全220

1.       Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.


(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant


(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds not to hire the applicant


(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them


(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hiredA


(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them


  d为什么不对

沙发
发表于 2005-3-14 21:48:00 | 只看该作者

D  an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired

单复数使用错误

板凳
发表于 2005-4-4 13:21:00 | 只看该作者
请问C不对的原因,是因为them有指代的错误吗,除了这个,还有别的错误吗?
请指教
地板
发表于 2005-4-4 16:27:00 | 只看该作者

grouds for doing 是 惯用 把   

grouds to do   is not proper

5#
发表于 2005-7-30 11:13:00 | 只看该作者
请问:E的错误是否在于 for five years prior to applying for a job ,放在前面
6#
发表于 2006-7-28 09:34:00 | 只看该作者
E  an applicant 和后面的 them 不一致 
7#
发表于 2010-7-18 19:49:22 | 只看该作者
明白E为什么是错的,但是A中时间状语in the five years修饰的可能是drug,而我觉得逻辑上应该是用来修饰use啊,这样的话,其实不是有歧义?是不是这道题本身就不好呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-24 09:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部