OG_SC 222, 疑问

rebuscat · 发表于 2003-5-20 09:43:00

222. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A)    enabling it to withhold from the public v
(B)    for it to withhold from the public
(C)    for withholding disclosure to the public of x
(D)    that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E)    that they can withhold public disclosure of

问题： to award powers to do就表示enable x to do了吗？虽然后面几个答案不对，但A也不确切呀。award powers 和enable x to do是不是重复呢？
Why not “to award x powers to do y” or “to award x powers, (注意逗号) enabling it to do...”

siebel · 发表于 2003-5-20 09:58:00

“to award x powers, (注意逗号) enabling it to do...” 就叫重复了。

enabling it to withhold from the public 就近修饰powers, 进一步阐明powers的内涵，反而不重复。

carefield · 发表于 2003-5-21 03:26:00

'enabling it to withhold from the public 就近修饰powers, 进一步阐明powers的内涵，反而不重复。" YES, YES

“to award x powers, (注意逗号) enabling it to do...”, 好像改了句子结构, ENABLING 的逻辑主语成了SUPREME COURT; 而文中的意思是指POWER 使 AGENCY 能去做什么...

to award x powers to do y, 有这一说法吗? 而却, 这样一来, 似乎AGENCY就一定要去做, 而不是只具备这样的能力去做.

本贴相关题目 OG (RING)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

OG_SC 222, 疑问

OG_SC 222, 疑问

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()