ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2171|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep2-210 关于伴随状语

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-2 14:58:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Emily Dickinson’sletters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A.    Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years beforeSusan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in1886, outnumbering
B.    Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years beforeSusan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in1886, outnumber
C.    Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’smarriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering
D.     Dickinson, which werewritten over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’sbrother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering    (E)
E.    Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years beforeSusan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in1886, outnumber
此题答案E。A中为什么不能把outnumbering看成是were written这个动作的伴随状语?因为were written是被动所以不行么?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-10-2 16:57:40 | 只看该作者
原来已经讨论过这题了。

“现在分词放句尾用逗号隔开做状语时有两种功能:表伴随动作(逻辑主语为句子主语)、表伴随结果(无逻辑主语)。
outnumber和were writing不是同一时间发生,语法上不能作为伴随动作。
outnumbering和前面的were written并没有直接因果关系,逻辑上不能作为伴随结果。"
板凳
发表于 2011-10-2 17:12:05 | 只看该作者
this sort of modifier(ING型独主的从句结构形式) should actually satisfy TWO requirements:
1) it should apply most nearly to the subject of the preceding clause (as you've said); and, even more importantly,
2) it should have one of the following RELATIONSHIPS to that clause:
* immediate consequence
* simultaneous, but lower-priority, action
here, this modifier doesn't have either of these 2 relationships to the main clause, so it's used inappropriately.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-2 19:16:39 | 只看该作者
其实我觉得were written和outnumbering也可以算得上是同时发生。所以我一直认为这也算是动作的伴随。
5#
发表于 2011-10-3 00:02:09 | 只看该作者
这两个动作不能同时发生的啊~考虑下逻辑~记住这个东西叫SC= Sentence correction. 并不完全是Grammar correction,所以很多题在复习的时候,要深究下语义逻辑。

were written是描述【写信】这个动作,前半句话是说【这些信在一个时间段写的】
而outnumber它暗含着一种【结果】的意味,相当于有一种感觉,像是【后人数她之前写过的信,发现这些信的数目超过了其他的信】

也就是说,两个动作并不在一个层面上。不可能说【一边写】然后一边【outnumber】
肯定是,先是【写信】,然后后人点数后发现它【outnumber】~
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-3 08:11:58 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上几位的解答,完全明白了。
7#
发表于 2011-10-5 18:27:31 | 只看该作者
这两个动作不能同时发生的啊~考虑下逻辑~记住这个东西叫SC= Sentence correction. 并不完全是Grammar correction,所以很多题在复习的时候,要深究下语义逻辑。

were written是描述【写信】这个动作,前半句话是说【这些信在一个时间段写的】
而outnumber它暗含着一种【结果】的意味,相当于有一种感觉,像是【后人数她之前写过的信,发现这些信的数目超过了其他的信】

也就是说,两个动作并不在一个层面上。不可能说【一边写】然后一边【outnumber】
肯定是,先是【写信】,然后后人点数后发现它【outnumber】~
-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/10/3 0:02:09)

懂了,版主果然威武
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 09:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部