ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the earth would warm and by how much, but climatologists have indicated all along that the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4710|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-24-Q23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-5 21:21:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-24-Q23

GWD-24-Q23

Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the Earth would warm and by how much, but climatologists have indicated all along that the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.

 

 

A.      the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.

B.      the effects that are the most obvious ones, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, would be those impacting the most on people.

C.      those effects to have the largest impact on people, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, are what are the most obvious effects.

D.     extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, the most obvious effects, that they would have the largest impact on people.

E.      extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, which are the most obvious effects, are those to impact the most on people.

正确答案为:A

可我的选择为E.请问E错在哪里了?

另外A当中的and those ,我怎么看怎么都觉得别扭。those 应该指代的是effects ,并且应该是包含在前面所说的most obvious effects 当中,而此句当中却和most obvious effects 为并列关系,我实在不能理解。

希望大家给予解释?谢谢!~

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-6 12:34:00 | 只看该作者

没有NN解答吗?~~自己顶顶~~~帮帮忙!~~谢谢

板凳
发表于 2009-8-6 16:36:00 | 只看该作者

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=700490&id=75113&page=1&skin=0&Star=3

我觉得27楼说的比较有道理,E 的逻辑是没法解释的

A 的插入成分确实别扭,但是要表达的意思是“最明显的效果,同时也是对人们影响最大的效果,是...”去掉的and 反而表达不出来

个人意见...这题光分析语法确实挺要命的

地板
发表于 2009-8-6 16:53:00 | 只看该作者
个人认为:首先E中的时态不好,句子前半段中暗示would,颇有虚拟的感觉,这与A中的would 相呼应,其次,those后面的todo结构你不觉得很awkward么,一般后面带修饰的使用Ing或者定语从句,用to do 的很少(有特定情况下用的,lzm上有说。最后,句子的逻辑中心在E发生了变化,这个SC题的本意是说xx是xx,E变掉了(不过这个不能完全作为依据的,要自己体会啦)
ps:A米有什么不好啊,读过去就是最通的嘛,如果不这么表达的话,你想还有什么表达能表示作者的意思呢?
5#
发表于 2010-5-5 22:19:37 | 只看该作者
我觉得在那么短的时间里很难看出这个意思啊。。。还是排除法靠谱一点
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 10:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部