ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1326|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 ti

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2022-9-17 10:44:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.


  • A
    that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

  • B
    that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

  • C
    that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

  • D
    CEO's who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

  • E
    CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times




(A) compared to的比较对象不对等,前者419 times the pay of blue-collar workers表达的是工资数, 而后者a ratio of是比率。
(B) a ratio that compares的compare不能用主动方式表达,应该是被比较sth be compared to…的省略形式(省略了主语和系动词,是惯用法);compare to的比较对象不对象等,前者419 times the pay of blue-collar workers表达的是工资数,而后者42 times是比率。
(C) 正确,as compared to比较结构,419 times the pay与42 times their pay比较,the ratio…是同位语。
(D) 缺少that引导宾语从句;indicates CEO's who…句子结构不完整,缺少谓语,who引导定语从句 修饰名词CEO's。
(E) 缺少that引导宾语从句;indicates CEO's earning…句子结构不完整,缺少谓语;compare to的 比较对象不对等,前者419 times the pay of blue-collar workers表达的是工资数,而后者42 times是 比率。

这道题我知道A为什么是错的,但是觉得很奇怪为什么“419 times the pay of blue-collar workers”为什么不是ratio,而与其平行的“42 times their pay”就可以被认为是ratio,
比如说如果这题把B选项修改为”that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compared to 42 times“能不能算对呢?

呜呜本小菜鸡纠结好久,麻烦各位友友发表一下看法!


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2022-10-14 15:59:24 | 只看该作者
a ratio that is compared to 42 times我觉得可以,毕竟是定语从句;
或者a ratio compared to 42 times
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2022-10-15 09:29:28 | 只看该作者
猫小新 发表于 2022-10-14 15:59
a ratio that is compared to 42 times我觉得可以,毕竟是定语从句;
或者a ratio compared to 42 times ...

这题我写几次就错几次,麻了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 06:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部