快来看看~~急求~~这个歧义很难懂~

狂威雪 · 发表于 2011-7-27 23:06:32

而prep1-97：Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago.这里面having可能修饰pollutants，也可能修饰they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants整个分句，所以having产生了修饰歧义

having做状语修饰前面的句子，而having还可以做定语修饰前面的pollutant。那如何很明确的分清是修饰前面的句子还是名词呢？

狂威雪 · 发表于 2011-7-28 12:02:57

ding

橙色的鱼 · 发表于 2011-7-28 12:46:11

修饰名词的话，就把ing改成定语从句

狂威雪 · 发表于 2011-7-28 23:27:25

修饰名词的话，就把ing改成定语从句

-- by 会员橙色的鱼 (2011/7/28 12:46:11)

按照这道题来说，ing 也可以修饰名词，不是吗？
这道题如何才能不产生歧义呢？

快来看看急求这个歧义很难懂~

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()