OG12 63新问！关于with独立主格与，v-ing结构的疑问

zhongshanlh · 发表于 2012-3-20 22:28:28

63. The yield of natural gas from Norway’s Troll gasfield is expected to increase annually until the year 2005 and then tostabilize at six billion cubic feet a day, which will allow such an extractionrate at least for 50 years’ production.

(A) 2005 and then tostabilize at six billion cubic feet a day, which will allow such an extraction

rate at least for

(B) 2005 and then tostabilize at six billion cubic feet a day, an extraction rate that will allowat

least

(D) 2005, then stabilizingat six billion cubic feet a day, allowing such an extraction rate for at least

(E)2005, then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet a day, which will allow suchan extraction rate for at least答案是B。
个人对于C选项和D选项中存在疑问。
C中2005 and then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet aday, with such an extraction rate at the least allowing。我们看到C中后半部分是一个with引导的独立主格成分。按照独立主格的作用和功能，应当是表示伴随的动作，同时这里因为是with的独立主格，所以应当与前面的主语The yield of natural gas有密切联系，表示动作的伴随。但是extraction rate与前面的The yield of natural gas没有密切的从属关系，同时前面的动作的谓语是are expected to，独立主格中的动作allowing与are expected没有伴随关系。所以这里的独立主格的用法是错误的吧？？？
可是OG的解释中只提到了the phrasing is awkward and unclear;并没有提到这里的独立主格的错误。
不知道我对于C中with引导的这个独立主格的看法是否正确呢，请大家指正！
D中(D) 2005, then stabilizingat six billion cubic feet a day, allowing such an extraction rate for at least。我们看到最后是一个，+v-ing的结构。按照道理来说这个V-ing的结构应当appeal to的是主句中的主语The yield of natural gas，可是OG对D的解释说 it is not clearwhat noun allowing is supposed to modify.
求解答！

zhongshanlh · 发表于 2012-3-21 10:30:42

zhongshanlh · 发表于 2012-3-21 11:48:09

mslancaster · 发表于 2012-3-21 13:37:14

In D, it is the six bn cubit feet a day allow rather than the yeild of gas allow, yield of gas can be any quantity.

In C, your point is correct. the with bla bla is wrongly used here. OG is not going to explain you the grammatical mistake that specific, unclear/awkward always mean the underlying part does not has a specified object to modify.

zhongshanlh · 发表于 2012-3-21 15:44:55

I am still not quite agree with you about answer D, and here is origin of my view:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-648003-1-1.html

In D, it is the six bn cubit feet a day allow rather than the yeild of gas allow, yield of gas can be any quantity.

In C, your point is correct. the with bla bla is wrongly used here. OG is not going to explain you the grammatical mistake that specific, unclear/awkward always mean the underlying part does not has a specified object to modify.

-- by 会员 mslancaster (2012/3/21 13:37:14)

superbat28 · 发表于 2012-3-21 16:30:45

D的话，你多想一步。
如果V-ing修饰The yield of natural gas，逻辑通顺吗？

当然是不通顺的。。那不通顺，类比于C，OG告诉你修饰Unclear,也就是说其实这个allowing没有可以用于修饰的名词。

zhongshanlh · 发表于 2012-3-21 16:39:10

谢谢bat斑斑！把你盼来了哈哈！
I got it！语法上是修饰the yield，但是并不符合逻辑，所以OG才说unclear！

D的话，你多想一步。
如果V-ing修饰The yield of natural gas，逻辑通顺吗？

当然是不通顺的。。那不通顺，类比于C，OG告诉你修饰Unclear,也就是说其实这个allowing没有可以用于修饰的名词。

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2012/3/21 16:30:45)

mslancaster · 发表于 2012-3-21 22:20:41

I am still not quite agree with you about answer D, and here is origin of my view:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-648003-1-1.html

In D, it is the six bn cubit feet a day allow rather than the yeild of gas allow, yield of gas can be any quantity.

In C, your point is correct. the with bla bla is wrongly used here. OG is not going to explain you the grammatical mistake that specific, unclear/awkward always mean the underlying part does not has a specified object to modify.

-- by 会员 mslancaster (2012/3/21 13:37:14)

-- by 会员 zhongshanlh (2012/3/21 15:44:55)

I am still not quite agree with you about answer D, and here is origin of my view:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-648003-1-1.html

In D, it is the six bn cubit feet a day allow rather than the yeild of gas allow, yield of gas can be any quantity.

In C, your point is correct. the with bla bla is wrongly used here. OG is not going to explain you the grammatical mistake that specific, unclear/awkward always mean the underlying part does not has a specified object to modify.

-- by 会员 mslancaster (2012/3/21 13:37:14)

-- by 会员 zhongshanlh (2012/3/21 15:44:55)

其实我的意思和斑竹的意思是一样的呀，D里面只能是主句主语gas allow,而gas不一定是six bn feet以上，因此未必能allow

但是其实伴随状语的用法局限性很大，这里即便逻辑通顺，这么用伴随状语也是很awkward的。你可以多找几个老外写的用了伴随状语的句子体会一下这个感觉，考试的时候时间压力大到你见到了很多熟悉的考点都未必能认出来，所以一定要反复读那个感觉。

之所以这么说，是因为我做GWD的时候正确率都已经85%以上了，结果考了个680.....所以才上CD认认真真的看到底自己差在什么地方，反复想，似乎就是差在把知识点融汇成感觉上了。与君共勉吧~

EMMALIULIU · 发表于 2012-8-19 03:05:39

ing做修饰语，用法比which灵活很多，可以修饰主语和动词，可以修饰一个从句，可以修饰紧跟的名词。
此题D选项无论从哪方面看allowing都用得不妥，修饰主语和动词，3楼说了yield of gas can be any quantity，但我不同意他说的是six bn cubit feet a day，因为allowing后面跟的是an extraction rate，这个错误点og里面反复解释了，这也就说明从修饰紧跟名词角度讲，allowing也用得不对。

Adacat · 发表于 2014-9-2 14:16:03

EMMALIULIU 发表于 2012-8-19 03:05
ing做修饰语，用法比which灵活很多，可以修饰主语和动词，可以修饰一个从句，可以修饰紧跟的名词。此题D选 ...

v-ing的形式放在句尾，只能修饰全句。所以此处，allowing逻辑不通。v-ing的形式放在句首时，才分为修饰句子主语和全句，两种情况

OG12 63新问！关于with独立主格与，v-ing结构的疑问

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()