ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2579|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助987-771

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-23 21:01:00 | 只看该作者

求助987-771

1.                             ?987-771 The labor agreement permits staff reductions through attrition with increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program for speeding it up.fficeffice" />


(A) attrition with increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program for speeding it up


(B) attrition and provides increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program to speed the attrition process


(C) attrition, which will be speeded up by providing increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program


(D) attrition, which, by their providing increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program, will speed the processB


(E) attrition, which provides increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program for speeding the attrition process


C??哪里错了?             原句中 increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program 同未化线部分是从属关系可是在B中变成并列关系.地位不是改变了吗?为什么还可以接受呢


    

沙发
发表于 2004-2-23 21:56:00 | 只看该作者
I am the same skeptical.


1, B has completely changed the original meaning by introducing a parallem.


2, 'to speed the attrition process' is less idiomatic than 'to speed up the attrition process.


3, On the contrary, C, i think, is good.

板凳
发表于 2004-2-24 00:26:00 | 只看该作者
C,我觉得有一个问题



C补全也就是:


attrition will be speeded up by providing increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program


这里providing分词短语的逻辑主语变成attrition,不合理呀~~


举个例子:


She earns her living by selling insurance.


这样的by doing才使用正确。


不过我也不是很确定,大家帮忙指正!





[此贴子已经被作者于2004-2-24 0:28:07编辑过]
地板
发表于 2004-2-26 16:01:00 | 只看该作者
顶一下,我的想法对不对?


who can confirm it for me?


5#
发表于 2004-2-27 21:10:00 | 只看该作者
         同意
6#
发表于 2004-3-5 03:44:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ecsniffer在2004-2-24 0:26:00的发言:
C,我觉得有一个问题



C补全也就是:


attrition will be speeded up by providing increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program


这里providing分词短语的逻辑主语变成attrition,不合理呀~~


举个例子:


She earns her living by selling insurance.


这样的by doing才使用正确。


不过我也不是很确定,大家帮忙指正!







Agreed. So now C is more wrong than B or C has bigger mistake. ------- this is     a very good point to crack SC questions. Thanks , escniffer.



but B still has     flaws:

1, permits attrition 与provides increased pension benefits and a special
early-retirement program

平行?实在说不通

2, speed the process? --- could not find any support for this usage. eg:



speed up phrasal verb

to move or happen faster, or to make something move or happen faster

ᅳopposite slow downThe truck speeded up going down the hill.

speed sth↔ up

The new system will speed up the registration process.



请大家讨论

7#
发表于 2006-3-10 22:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ecsniffer在2004-2-24 0:26:00的发言:
C,我觉得有一个问题

C补全也就是:
attrition will be speeded up by providing increased pension benefits and a special early-retirement program
这里providing分词短语的逻辑主语变成attrition,不合理呀~~
举个例子:
She earns her living by selling insurance.
这样的by doing才使用正确。
不过我也不是很确定,大家帮忙指正!



质疑一下权威:

attrition will be speeded up by providing increased 和She earns her living by selling insurance是不一样的,前者是被动语态,后者是主动语态

被动的逻辑主语是第三者,by providing的逻辑主语也是第三者,而不是attrition

而主动语态中by的逻辑主语是句子的主语

C选项错误的原因是:

(1) 不必要的被动;(2) 精确性 attrition be speeded up不如attrition process贴切;(3)可能的非限定修饰的错误

希望和大家探讨并给予确认

8#
发表于 2007-1-1 20:47:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-21 19:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部