The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.
The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.
(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell (E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
我倒是觉得不选B的原因不是那个those。第一，我觉得B的那个状语位置in 1999不是很好。我觉得这句话的意思，是想说1999年通过了这个法案。但是如果把1999放在那个法案名称的后面这句话是有两个意思的。一个是通过了1999年的那个法案。至于这个1999年的法案是1999通过还是2000通过就不知道了。第二个就是在1999通过了那个法案。而且，which虽然在Gmat里面有时候不是最近修饰原则，但是如果选项里面有最近修饰，最好还是最近修饰吧！the intent of selling. 我觉得就是selling的目的。那个新东方的规则，我觉得还是不要用了吧……我没上过课，但是我是看的flash。刚开始我做题的时候，也是老照着那个方法。结果错的稀里哗啦的。他的那个方法，就是做他挑出来的题比较管用。况且，这种又不是固定搭配，是一定错的。怎么能根据这个定义排除选项呢？
-- by 会员 cynthia627 (2009/12/5 16:00:10)
恩~
那你觉得for可以表目的吗？
因为总是说to do表目的。现在这里of也表了目的了。。
-- by 会员 shiwen66666 (2009/12/5 16:52:41)
不是这个意思的啊！A of B这个结构总是没问题的吧？B的A，那个intent of sell一样的道理。这里不是指标目的了，而是就是intent这个名词。什么的目的。要卖出去的目的。那个for当然不是这种情况了。你说的to do表目的，是说做了什么事情为了干什么。这种表目的！现在人家就是说（卖它的目的）。不用那种干了什么为了去干什么的方式~ 换一种说法而已啊！
不是这个意思的啊！A of B这个结构总是没问题的吧？B的A，那个intent of sell一样的道理。这里不是指标目的了，而是就是intent这个名词。什么的目的。要卖出去的目的。那个for当然不是这种情况了。你说的to do表目的，是说做了什么事情为了干什么。这种表目的！现在人家就是说（卖它的目的）。不用那种干了什么为了去干什么的方式~ 换一种说法而已啊！
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-12-5 12:37:36
收藏
收藏
楼主
