PREP-1-85

shiwen66666 · 发表于 2009-12-5 21:38:17

85. (29201-!-item-!-188;#058&003882)

In 1945, after a career as First Lady in which she shattered expectations more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman.

(A) more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison ever had been, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman

(B) more audaciously than either Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, President Harry S Truman had Eleanor Roosevelt appointed to be a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly

(C) with an audacity never matched in the case of Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, President Harry S Truman had Eleanor Roosevelt appointed as a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly

(D) with an audacity never matched by Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman

(E) with an audacity never matched either in the case of Abigail Adams or of Dolly Madison's, Eleanor Roosevelt was appointed to be a delegate to the United Nations General Assembly by President Harry S Truman

问一下，这个with为什么能加上，答案是D

zanyingsan · 发表于 2009-12-5 22:58:01

这里的with前面又没有逗号，不会造成什么歧义

shiwen66666 · 发表于 2009-12-5 23:03:47

这里的with前面又没有逗号，不会造成什么歧义

-- by 会员 zanyingsan (2009/12/5 22:58:01)

with不是说经常作为G的错误选项出现吗请问什么时候他就不对了？

比如在p1 46、47它不对；在p1 57对。。

yidiyuehan · 发表于 2009-12-6 00:29:22

PREP 总结的 with 是作为状语修饰主语的, 逻辑主语是句子的主语, 如果修饰有歧义的话或者逻辑上不通的话是错误的.
一般放在句首是没有歧义的,
如果放在句中 / 句尾就要注意有没有歧义了.

zanyingsan · 发表于 2009-12-6 00:52:17

如果with在逗号后，然后这时候就要看修饰会不会歧义了，一般说来with是语法上修饰最靠近with的分句的主语。如果这个主语在逻辑上也符合，那么就没有歧义，如果不符合，就有歧义。你可以看看prep里动物园猴子那道题，体会一下就近分句的含义。

shiwen66666 · 发表于 2009-12-6 11:01:17

en ~谢啦~

PREP-1-85

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()