ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2928|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep part1 132(compare的比较题,和gwd中答案不同)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-20 14:58:00 | 只看该作者

prep part1 132(compare的比较题,和gwd中答案不同)


    

132.
            
(31556-!-item-!-188;#058&004545)
A recent review of pay scales indicates that
CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers,
compared to a ratio of 42 times
in 1980.
(A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times
more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times


    

(B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the
pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times


    

(C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the
pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio


    

(D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 times more
pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio


    

(E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the
pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

给的答案是c,个人觉得b挺好的,gwd的答案也是b,请讨论


沙发
发表于 2008-5-20 16:30:00 | 只看该作者

    

給你參考,以下是外國人看B 的感覺,他們會讀成 ratio指419 times.


choice b is badly
worded: 'compares to 42 times in 1980' seems to say that, on forty-two
different occasions in 1980, the ceo:blue-collar ratio reached 419:1. this is
not what we are trying to say.


板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-20 22:10:00 | 只看该作者
但 C中有几个问题不清楚,1.as的用法 2 their的指代问题 既可以指代workers 也可以是CEOs
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-21 22:38:00 | 只看该作者
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-22 11:05:00 | 只看该作者
这么有难度的比较题为什么没有人一起接着讨论,再顶
6#
发表于 2009-3-29 22:39:00 | 只看该作者
121
7#
发表于 2009-8-9 10:43:00 | 只看该作者
up
8#
发表于 2009-10-29 22:17:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 08:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部