ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6105|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全293

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-2 01:53:00 | 只看该作者

大全293

293.        Federal incentives now encourage investing capital in commercial office buildings despite vacancy rates in existing structures that are exceptionally high and no demand for new construction.

(A) investing capital in commercial office buildings despite vacancy rates in existing structures that are exceptionally high and

(B) capital investment in commercial office buildings, even though vacancy rates in existing structures are exceptionally high and there is

(C) capital to be invested in commercial office buildings even though there are exceptionally high vacancy rates in existing structures with

(D) investing capital in commercial office buildings even though the vacancy rates are exceptionally high in existing structures withB

(E) capital investment in commercial office buildings despite vacancy rates in existing structures that are exceptionally high, and although there

我的问题有三:

1有.encourage to do /encourage sth的用法,题中encourage doing的用法对不对?

2.with no demond for sth 比there be 结构更简洁,为什么不用?

3.B比C优,就是因为even though 后面没有用there be 句型吗?


谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2004-7-2 03:09:00 | 只看该作者


encourage

verb [T] (Cambridge Dictionary of American English )
to help (someone) to feel confident and able to do something, or strongly to advise (someone) to do something



Our parents always encouraged us to ask questions.------------encourage sb to do sth
If something encourages an activity, it supports it or makes it more likely: The city needs to encourage job creation.------------------encourage sth


another usage is : encourage sb in sth(but  in Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary )


to talk or behave in a way that gives someone confidence to do something:
They've always encouraged me in everything I've wanted to do.


板凳
发表于 2004-7-2 03:38:00 | 只看该作者

2.with no demond for sth 比there be 结构更简洁,为什么不用?

with 结构表示的是一种伴随状态,C中there are exceptionally high vacancy rates in existing structures with no demand for new construction. 中WITH修饰的是vacancy rates,从意思上

逻辑不用,所以错。

3.B比C优,就是因为even though 后面没有用there be 句型吗?

B的意思清晰,结构清楚,没有歧义

even though vacancy rates in existing structures are exceptionally high and there is no demand for new construction 表明了两个同时存在的条件,一是空住率高,二是对新房子没有需求

我的体会是GMAT没有定式,虽然要求简洁,但是意思逻辑清楚没有歧义是基本,有时候不能光看形式,共勉!

  


地板
发表于 2004-7-25 17:11:00 | 只看该作者

一看到there is,我就把B排除了。。。不是说there is只能用于某处有某物吗?郁闷!

5#
发表于 2004-9-28 20:34:00 | 只看该作者

借此题问一下with的跳跃修饰。这里with是修饰rates吗?为什么呢?是因为和in existing structures一样,介词短语并列修饰吗?会不会有修饰structures的歧义呢?

6#
发表于 2004-9-29 10:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用携隐在2004-9-28 20:34:00的发言:

借此题问一下with的跳跃修饰。这里with是修饰rates吗?为什么呢?是因为和in existing structures一样,介词短语并列修饰吗?会不会有修饰structures的歧义呢?


demand的动作发出者不应该是rate,所以,从逻辑上讲,with没有合理的修饰对象,无论rate还是structure都可能成为潜在的修饰对象,但两者从逻辑上讲不通。

7#
发表于 2004-9-29 12:56:00 | 只看该作者
也就是说,with的修饰对象主要是依靠逻辑关系来判断的?比如本题,假设rate可以发出demand的动作(假设而已),那么with是否能清晰地修饰rate而没有修饰structure的歧义(因为structure从逻辑上来说不可能是with修饰的对象)?
8#
发表于 2004-9-29 14:14:00 | 只看该作者

偶觉得with和其它介词在修饰对象上应该是一样的,即优先修饰离其最近的名词。

不同的是,with可以引导独立主格结构。

9#
发表于 2004-9-29 15:28:00 | 只看该作者

那就是说,在本题优先修饰structure了?

我总有个模糊的印象,好像做到过一些题,两个介词短语连着,并列修饰同一个名词。抱歉想不起例子了。不知道是不是有这种情况?

10#
发表于 2004-9-29 15:47:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用携隐在2004-9-29 15:28:00的发言:

那就是说,在本题优先修饰structure了?


-是的


我总有个模糊的印象,好像做到过一些题,两个介词短语连着,并列修饰同一个名词。抱歉想不起例子了。不知道是不是有这种情况?


-偶不记得有这种情况,但是有名词+with介词短语+定语从句的,后两者同时修饰前面的名词。


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-15 15:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部