ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4898|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全762

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-5 06:25:00 | 只看该作者

大全762

11.   The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when he sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.


(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing which指代abolition


(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed which指代abolition/which重复


(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing


(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differedE表面上好,逻辑错


(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing


In choice A, was is incorrect; the verb must be were to agree with times. (主谓不一致) Also, which becomes the subject of a compound verb that lacks parallelism: was determined…and differing. (???) In choice B, was is again incorrect, and the use of two which clauses is awkward. (笨拙) In choice C, which were determined…and differing is another faulty compound verb. (???) Choice D presents a false compound: determined is an adjective modifying local times and differed is the simple past tense of to differ. (不平行) Because they serve different grammatical functions, these words cannot be treated as parallel elements joined by and. Choice E is best: without which, determined and differing function not as verb elements but as parallel modifiers of local times. (平行) This question is very difficult.



which becomes the subject of a compound verb that lacks parallelism: was determined…and differing. (???)  In choice C, which were determined…and differing is another faulty compound verb. (???)



这两句OG为何说它们不平行 which were determined ...and (were ) differing 是平行的啊


虽然不如E简洁



谢谢

沙发
发表于 2004-8-5 14:58:00 | 只看该作者

were determined里的were表达的是被动,were differing里表达的是过去进行时,两个were的功能不一样,所以不能省略。

就算补出了were, 由于时态语态都不一致,所以也是不对称的。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-5 23:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rhod在2004-8-5 14:58:00的发言:

were determined里的were表达的是被动,were differing里表达的是过去进行时,两个were的功能不一样,所以不能省略。


就算补出了were, 由于时态语态都不一致,所以也是不对称的。



rhod, 这个能详细地讲讲吗 没明白啊 平行并不要求在从句主被动完全一致 因为这是根据句意判断的


谢谢

地板
发表于 2004-8-6 09:16:00 | 只看该作者
先假设C里differing和determined并列并公用were,那么后面一句话就变成了were differing from city to city;这里的过去进行时表示什么?用的不对吧,这里本来应该用现在分词表示主动、正在进行和持续的意思;还有会造成differing和were determined 对应的嫌疑。
5#
发表于 2004-8-6 10:10:00 | 只看该作者
如leeon所言,首先,were differing其实不合理,此外,从句子的结构来看,C的意图应该是想将which定从和differing现分两个定语结构作为平行使用,所以,从这个大结构来看,C显然是违背了平行原则的。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-6 10:42:00 | 只看该作者

were differing from city to city为何不对


因为主句用的是一般过去时 所以这里只能用过去时态


表示过去正在进行的状态 所以只能用过去进行时

7#
发表于 2004-8-6 10:52:00 | 只看该作者
C读起来就是觉得不是很顺溜,rhod的解释看来是可取的,第一个were作被动+时态助动词,而第二个were,应该是时态助动词,两者功能不同。
8#
发表于 2004-8-6 11:23:00 | 只看该作者

stoneren兄已经帮我说了。

第一个were作被动+时态助动词,而第二个were,应该是时态助动词

我的意思就是"此were非那were".

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-6 23:04:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢 明白了
10#
发表于 2004-8-8 14:51:00 | 只看该作者

請問大全762

以下是引用paopao在2004-8-5 6:25:00的发言:

11.   The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when he sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.


(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing which指代abolition



(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed which指代abolition/which重复



(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing


(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differedE表面上好,逻辑错



(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing


In choice A, was is incorrect; the verb must be were to agree with times. (主谓不一致) Also, which becomes the subject of a compound verb that lacks parallelism: was determined…and differing. (???) In choice B, was is again incorrect, and the use of two which clauses is awkward. (笨拙) In choice C, which were determined…and differing is another faulty compound verb. (???) Choice D presents a false compound: determined is an adjective modifying local times and differed is the simple past tense of to differ. (不平行) Because they serve different grammatical functions, these words cannot be treated as parallel elements joined by and. Choice E is best: without which, determined and differing function not as verb elements but as parallel modifiers of local times. (平行) This question is very difficult.



which becomes the subject of a compound verb that lacks parallelism: was determined…and differing. (???)  In choice C, which were determined…and differing is another faulty compound verb. (???)



这两句OG为何说它们不平行 which were determined ...and (were ) differing 是平行的啊


虽然不如E简洁



谢谢



我覺得此處be determined和 differ變成在修飾前一句主詞The growth, 因為參照大全624 及大全626, 可以發現626 中 不可用depending,而必須要用who depend來修飾historians, 那為何此句的differring 可用來修飾times?


謝謝!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 06:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部