ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9912|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD24-23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-21 15:56:00 | 只看该作者

GWD24-23

24-23 Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the Earth would warm and by how much, but climatologists have indicated all along that the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.


A) the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.


B) the effects that are the most obvious ones, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, would be those impacting the most on people.


C) those effects to have the largest impact on people, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, are what are the most obvious effects.


D) extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, the most obvious effects, that they would have the largest impact on people.


E) extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, which are the most obvious effects, are those to impact the most on people.


KEY:A


I don't understand the structure of "A"


Hope somebody give me some advice!


Thanks!

沙发
发表于 2004-10-21 16:27:00 | 只看该作者

the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.

=the most obvious effects would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess. and those(effects) that would have the largest impact on people would ALSO be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.

板凳
发表于 2004-10-21 19:07:00 | 只看该作者

24-23. Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the Earth would warm and by how much, but(前後對比) climatologists have indicated all along that(引導後面子句) the most obvious effects, and those(most obvious effects) that would have the largest impact on people(插入句可忽略), (most obvious effects)would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess(and 並列三個).

總的來說就是but 前後各是一個主句帶一個從句,前後句意約略相反

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-21 19:25:00 | 只看该作者

thanks!!!!!!

GWD24 here
5#
发表于 2004-10-24 21:20:00 | 只看该作者
但would的使用有没有异议呢?会不会让人感觉除了有indicated that +过去式,也有一种感觉,科学家显示的是可能错误的
6#
发表于 2004-10-25 23:01:00 | 只看该作者

这题中and those...插入语的结构跟OG64完全一样!

40.   In metalwork one advantage of adhesive-bonding over spot-welding is that the contact, and hence the bonding, is effected continuously over a broad surface instead of a series of regularly spaced points with no bonding in between.

(A) instead of
(B) as opposed to
(C) in contrast with
(D) rather than atD

(E) as against being at

7#
发表于 2004-12-11 19:24:00 | 只看该作者

LES

agk

You are right~

8#
发表于 2004-12-14 11:21:00 | 只看该作者
原题呢???
9#
发表于 2004-12-19 16:01:00 | 只看该作者
LES你舉的例子很好,不過你可不可以在補充些,像這樣的插入句的,我對這種東西很沒有感覺
10#
发表于 2005-10-21 12:33:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用LES在2004-10-25 23:01:00的发言:

这题中and those...插入语的结构跟OG64完全一样!


40.   In metalwork one advantage of adhesive-bonding over spot-welding is that the contact, and hence the bonding, is effected continuously over a broad surface instead of a series of regularly spaced points with no bonding in between.


(A) instead of
(B) as opposed to
(C) in contrast with
(D) rather than atD

(E) as against being at





and those恐怕不应该理解为插入吧。上例是and hence,就好比我们写AA,AI是使用的and thus一样,表示递近意思的并列啊!


个人认为这里的and就是and,不是和those一起的,开始我也认为这里的and用的不对,但重新考虑整句的意思,发现的确两个主语并列.两者可能一致,也可能不一致,合并构成从句的主语.[明确的名词,和可能的限定,使两个表述的内容可能不同,因此可以并列,并不重复]

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 11:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部