再次请教GWD-21-19

Regardless of their form or function, all aerodynamically enhanced, curved objects made for throwing have been called boomerangs by non-Australians even since 1788, when Europeans saw Dharug-peaking men tossing “bumariny” in the area later known as Sydney.

A.      Regardless of their form or function, all aerodynamically enhanced, curved objects made for throwing have been called boomerangs by non-Australians even since 1788,

B.     Regardless of their form or function, any aerodynamically enhanced, curved object made for throwing has been called a boomerang by non-Australians even since 1788,

C.     Ever since 1788, non-Australians have called all aerodynamically enhanced, curved objects made for throwing boomerangs, regardless of their form or function, from

D.     Ever since 1788, any aerodynamically enhanced, curved object made for throwing has been called a boomerang by non-Australians, regardless of its form or function, from

E.     Non-Australians have called all aerodynamically enhanced, curved objects made for throwing boomerang ever since 1788, regardless of their form or function, from

答案是A，但是我认为不对。

regardless of的主语不应该是人吗？而且我认为被动总不是好的形式，这样我认为应该首先排除ABD,而C的错误不确定，与E对比起来when 与1788离得较远，所以我就选了much better 的E啦~

Additionally,如果选A的话，那么B也可以算正确啊，B将all 改为any后，接下来的谓语和宾语也一起改成单数形式，并没有错误

欢迎讨论！！

答案是A，但是我认为不对。

regardless of的主语不应该是人吗？而且我认为被动总不是好的形式，这样我认为应该首先排除ABD,而C的错误不确定，与E对比起来when 与1788离得较远，所以我就选了much better 的E啦~

Additionally,如果选A的话，那么B也可以算正确啊，B将all 改为any后，接下来的谓语和宾语也一起改成单数形式，并没有错误

欢迎讨论！！

regardless of的主语不应该是人吗？

为啥一定要是人？？

嗯~这点倒是忽略了~~呼呼~~还是overthere细心啊~

regardless of means without consideration of ... / without regard to   

How can an objects consider sth or regard sth?

welcome further discussion~~Thx