ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 917|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT 7-1-14

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-27 03:46:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT 7-1-14

LSAT 7-1-14

Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists’ hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong.

The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.

(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.

(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.

(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.E

(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.

请NN帮忙看看吧,没有找到讨论。谢谢

沙发
发表于 2006-8-27 04:32:00 | 只看该作者
答案是不是E?
A) "Lobsters not caught in lobster traps" -- who cares.  这里讨论的是"Lobsters  in lobster traps"
B) "
longest known period  " --  who  cares.  for example, 2nd longest won't change anything in the argument

C) yes, it is unusual. or NO, it is usual. So what?
D) we are talking about Lobster, Let's focus on Lobster. Other species(such as Human or shark) won't matter here
E) 如果不成立. 龙虾们有足够的食物, 那么他们就不用自相残杀, 也就不会削弱biologists’ hypothesis
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 11:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部