同问。不是说一句话中代词指代对象必须相同吗? 还有另一个问题:在对称中,一定要复数对应复数吗?D为什么错?用a owner对应owners不行吗?还有,用定冠词the为什么不行?为什么要改成their?
记得GEMJ也曾经讨论过这个问题,他们的答案是在同一句子中物主代词和人称代词是可以指向不同的。
这是我的一点总结,请指教:
(一) 同一句中,人称代词和物主代词可以指代不同的东东;
OG230. In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have
been priced to sell, and they are. (A) have been priced to sell, and they are (B) are priced to sell, and they have (C) are priced to sell, and they do (D) are being priced to sell, and have (E) had been priced to sell, and they have ANSWER:C their指酒商,they 指酒
OG60. According to a recent poll, owning and living in a freestanding house on its own land is still a
goal of a majority of young adults, like that of earlier generations. A. like that of earlier generations B. as that for earlier generations C. just as earlier generations did D. as have earlier generations E. as it was of earlier generations 答案E.
不同句中(比如用分句隔开),同一代词可以指代不同东东;
In this atmosphere, it is not fair to condemn as failures all attempted experiments; it may be more accurate to say many never had a fair trial.
但是同一句中(用或不用逗号隔开),相同的代词只能指代一件东东
og12 Formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to new small businesses in the same way as they do to established big businesses, because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium.1st they指formulas, 2nd they指small businesses 错
在总结中我有一个感觉:ETS出题真的是八股到家,如果在可能的情况做到绝对平衡对称,就一定不要对相对的平衡!! 有如此题:(C) Whereas owners of condominium apartments have free and clear title to their dwellings 中的owners...have...to...与主句的owners...have...in...单复一致,是非常完美的对称形式。an owner其实也没有语法错误,只是不合ETS的BT八股要求而已。在这种BT的严格要求下,有时在对称中多一词少一词就可以排除该选项!
另外,对于携隐JJ提出的为什么不用the而用their,我的一点个人想法是:the是特指前面出现过的具体dwelling,但这里并没有如此的指代,因此要改为their。就象我们在主句owners of cooperative apartments have shares in a corporation that owns a building and leases apartments to them.中找不到the特指一样。
供参考。
|