ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

For the first time in the modern era, non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority in California, which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters only a decade ago.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4246|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-13-30,搜索得到的讨论不了了之。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-31 11:29:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-13-30,搜索得到的讨论不了了之。

GWD-13-30搜索得到的讨论不了了之。

Q30:


For the first time in the modern era, non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority in LACE w:st="on">CaliforniaLACE>, which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly there-quarters only a decade ago.






  1. which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters only a decade ago


  2. which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from a decade ago, when it was nearly three-quarters
  3. and that amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from a decade ago, when they were nearly three-quarters
  4. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters a decade ago


  5. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from what it was a decade ago by nearly three-quarters

答案是D,请教A?


再请大牛确认这里的which到底指代whites还是minority?

沙发
发表于 2005-7-31 22:01:00 | 只看该作者
关于which的用法,楼主参看一下这个超长讨论贴吧http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=493160&id=53201&page=1&skin=0&Star=10
板凳
发表于 2009-1-28 23:40:00 | 只看该作者

补充一下LS,ETS的答复在89楼:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=467658&id=53201&page=1&skin=0&Star=9

并且对于which的就近修饰问题回答的很含糊。这是个老问题啊~~

对于本题来说,逻辑上看which应当修饰non-Hispanic Whites(与主句的谓语修饰相同)

从就近原则上来看,那应该也是修饰California吧?不可能是minority

地板
发表于 2009-1-28 23:42:00 | 只看该作者
对于为什么把only去掉,有没有语法上的解释呢?期待牛牛回答
5#
发表于 2009-1-29 12:00:00 | 只看该作者
  好贴~等待讨论
6#
发表于 2009-1-29 12:50:00 | 只看该作者
这句话which所指应该是主语non-Hispanic Whites,所以用which定语从句就存在指代问题了,而用分词表伴随很好啊.
open to discuss
7#
发表于 2009-1-29 13:43:00 | 只看该作者
  可是我觉得这里的指Whites的话是不是应该用who会更好一点呢?
8#
发表于 2009-4-18 20:14:00 | 只看该作者

which amounts  单数 可修 a minority 或 California  歧意

which 加逗号隔开 修饰对象可近可远  要靠其他元素确立(如动词)

amounting to 句尾的分词从句就只往前修饰逻辑主语 无歧意

only为何省略就无从得知了

一家之言

9#
发表于 2009-7-31 18:23:00 | 只看该作者
A
10#
发表于 2009-8-1 16:35:00 | 只看该作者
.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 08:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部