有道ARGU我只能看出1个破绽，希望NN们指点

这个我感觉不是很好写，希望NN们给出几个这里的逻辑缺陷，谢谢了

The following appeared in a memorandum from the information technology department of a major advertising firm:

“The more efficient a firm’s employees are, the more profitable that firm will be. Improvements in a firm’s information technology hardware and software are a proven way to increase the efficiency of employees who do the majority of their work on computers. Therefore, if our firm invests in the most powerful and advanced information technology available, employee productivity will be maximized. This strategy ensures that every dollar spent on enhanced information technology will help to increase our firm’s profit margins.”  

Discuss how well reasoned . . .etc.

员工工作效率的提高可以给企业带来利益。通过提高INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY的软硬件可以提高那些主要依赖于电脑的员工的工作效率。所以某公司决定在软硬件方面多投资，这样的话提高了员工的产能，也能为企业带来收益。

1.硬件和软件的提升能在某种程度上对IT人员的工作效率有帮助但是并不意味着employee productivity will be maximized <--太极端了

IT人员本身的素质以及专业能力是最重要的，只有在其专业能力受制于设备时，提升硬件和软件才有相应的回报

2.另外 新的系统和软件的应用 需要一段时间让员工适应 而并不是价格越高的硬件软件就更适合工作 只有真正适合实际需求的硬件软件才能切实帮助IT人员 所以在硬件和软件上无意义的更多的花费并不能起到提升工作效率的作用

3.

The following appeared in a memorandum from the IT department of a major advertising firm:

but 结论是increase our firm’s profit margins

but 结论是increase our firm’s profit margins

即使满足了受制于硬件软件 并花费了金钱购置这些东西，也不能保证整个公司员工工作效率的最大化，它错误的把IT部门效率的提高推定成了整个公司员工工作效率的提高。一个广告公司的核心部门是设计部门，而IT部门是为设计部门做支撑，如果设计部门不能有效完成订单，再强的IT部门也无所作为

The following appeared in a memorandum from the IT department of a major advertising firm:

but 结论是increase our firm’s profit margins

but 结论是increase our firm’s profit margins

即使满足了受制于硬件软件 并花费了金钱购置这些东西，也不能保证整个公司员工工作效率的最大化，它错误的把IT部门效率的提高推定成了整个公司员工工作效率的提高。一个广告公司的核心部门是设计部门，而IT部门是为设计部门做支撑，如果设计部门不能有效完成订单，再强的IT部门也无所作为

我就想到这3点 呵呵

哇赛～～

感谢～～

1.结论基于未曾论证的假设：目前公司的软硬件设施已经不能满足员工的需要。如果软件、硬件虽然不是最先进的，但已经足够员工使用，那么还花钱升级，恐怕不能提高生产效率。

2.除此之外，最新的软硬件对于公司的员工而言需要时间适应，这段时间的生产效率可能不升反降。

3.再次，最新的软硬件因为没有经过充分的市场检验，往往存在一些瑕疵，很可能对公司的生产效率产生不利影响。

In the first place, the author's strategy rests on the assumption that the more efficient a firm's employees are, the more profitable that firm will be. However, if it turns out that the profitability of the firm is due to a combination of factors, some of which will remain unchanged in the future, such as the emploee's motivation and the width of the market, only improving emploee's efficiency might have no impact on the firm's profitability.

In the second place, the evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to extablish a general conclusion. Only improving the efficiency of employees who do the majority of their work on computers is not necessarily a good indicator of the efficiency of the whole company, unless it can be shown that 99% of the employees in the firm do the majority of their work on computers. It is possible that the efficiency of the employees who work on computers is improved while the efficiency of the employees who work on developing relationships with clients is lowered. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that employee productivity will be maximized is completely unwarranted.

提到PROFIT MARGIN的都很好写

因为利润取决于收入减成本，所以很多可以ARGUE的：不能提高收入，不能马上降低成本，技术落后等等。。