1.
The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she
suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with
no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually
promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to
minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a
commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a
commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion（C）
(E) quota, not one that reflected
that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment
The answer should be C. I got A, the explanation is minority hiring and eventually
promoting don't paralleled each other.Is it bc minority hiring is n+ving and eventually promoting is adv+ving?
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-22 2:12:10编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-3-22 02:07:00
楼主
