In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.

1. arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights

2. arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women

3. a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights

4. a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights

5. a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

答案为E,

A的错误就只是因为a treatise 的指代不明确吧？如果用the treatise是不是就对了？

虽然看布懂说的啥意思，但是看倒CDE都是同位语， 多半就是它们了

另外同位语里面还有个平行argued for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes in the married women’s property laws

A这两点都不满足咯

In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.

1. arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights

2. arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women

3. a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights

4. a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights

5. a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

答案为E,

A的错误就只是因为a treatise 的指代不明确吧？如果用the treatise是不是就对了？

1. conditions, and in using the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, can decide

2. conditions, and they use the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses in deciding

3. conditions, and, in using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses,  deciding

4. conditions and, using the set of objective criteria derived from these analyses, decide

5. conditions, and in their use the set of objective criteria they derive from these analyses, decide

选D

A中的can decide…和examine不并列。

A，D中的Using 和in using好像没有区别？

对哦，还有平行的问题！！！~

你这样改语法上是没错了，但是逻辑意思上把 treatise 放哪儿呢？

67.   Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy

(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food

(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food

(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

Logical predication + Idiom

The original sentence contains an incorrect idiom and a misplaced modifier. The correct idiom in the active voice is one attributes x (an effect) toy (a cause).

In the passive voice, x (the effect) is attributed to y (the cause). The modifying phrase (in attributing...) incorrectly describes perpetrators when it should describe defense attorneys.
    The best way to correct the sentence is to transform the modifying phrase into a subordinate clause that uses the idiom correctly: criminal or delinquent behavior (x) is attributed to (verb phrase) an allergy to some food (y).

这句的意思是说 in doing sth.只能修饰but之后的主语吧，而题目中的using是executive发出的动作？？

恩，同意你的说法， 但这个并不能说明in doing 和doing的区别啊

题目中using的逻辑主语是executive。

我对in doing的意见还是之前那个帖子。