ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4105|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD1-Q7 (TN版)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-17 01:36:00 | 只看该作者

GWD1-Q7 (TN版)

GWD1-Q7:

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

 

A.      that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

B.       that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

C.      that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

D.      CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

E.       CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

TN给的答案为:C

但是我感觉B更好啊,因为C中的their指代不清啊,请解释一下,谢谢……

沙发
发表于 2008-9-17 14:03:00 | 只看该作者
B错在COMPARES
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-18 00:15:00 | 只看该作者

回复:(iamwuyan)B错在COMPARES

COMPARES错什么了啊?可不可以解释详细点啊,大姐姐?
地板
发表于 2008-9-18 00:44:00 | 只看该作者
B的42 times之後少了一個受詞
42 times the pay of blue-collar workers?
42 times of what CEO's now earn?
5#
发表于 2008-9-29 02:40:00 | 只看该作者

在一个讨论上看到的:

Acompare to的前后不匹配,CEOa ratio

B is the besta ratio that ...ratio指代前面经常是ETS正确答案的标志

Ctheir指代不清

DE,缺that

6#
发表于 2008-9-29 03:17:00 | 只看该作者
xiaochun624, prep上有原題, 所以B必錯, 所以妳看到的對B的解釋必錯
7#
发表于 2008-10-11 11:31:00 | 只看该作者

B)A recent review of pay scales indicates that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times in 1980.

C) A recent review of pay scales indicates that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio in 1980.

我自己一開始是選B  也認為C的their指代不清  因此把BC兩句跟原題做了結合,如上,這樣看了比較清楚

iamwuyan提到B錯在compares.我想他說的原因是動詞時態--跟1980的ratio做比較,compare動作既已完成應該用過去式;AlienX說42times後面少了受詞--的確跟原題結合之後,搞不懂42倍是跟1980年啥東西做比較

C選項有加受詞相對清楚,但their指代不是很清楚一開始會造成困擾。不過細細推敲句意,CEO的薪水是藍領工人的419倍-->419:1,以藍領工人的薪水為基準;42 times their pay--> 42:1,比較的對象在結構上要平衡,所以還是以藍領工人的薪水為基準,所以42 times their pay的their指代藍領工人

個人一點想法 不知這樣的邏輯正確否,請各位指教

8#
发表于 2008-11-9 11:55:00 | 只看该作者

回复:(qiqiusa)GWD1-Q7 (TN版)

順手把PREP上的解釋貼出,上面解說挺詳盡的,請參考

(A)
                
compared to
的比較物件不物件,前者419 times the pay of
                
blue-collar workers
表達的是工資數,
            
而後者a ratio of是比率。

(B) a ratio that comparescompare不能用主動方式表達,應該是被比較sth
                
be
                
compared
                
to…
的省
            
略形(省略了主語和系動詞是慣用法compare
                
to
的比較物件不物件前者419
                
times
                
the
                
pay
                
of blue-collar workers
表達的是工資數,而後者42 times是比率。

(C)  正確as
                
compared
                
to
比較結構419
                
times
                
the
                
pay
42
                
times
                
their
                
pay
比較the
                
ratio
是同位
            
語。

(D)  缺少that引導賓語從句;indicates CEO’s who…句子結構不完整,缺少謂語,who引導定語從句
            
修飾名詞CEO’s

(E)  缺少that引導賓語從句;indicates CEO’s earning…結構不完整,缺少謂語;compare
                
to

            
比較物件不物件,前者419 times the
                
pay of blue-collar workers
表達的是工資數,而後者42 times
            
比率。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-9 11:56:45编辑过]
9#
发表于 2009-7-30 08:54:00 | 只看该作者

ding

10#
发表于 2010-4-13 09:34:04 | 只看该作者
赞同7楼意见
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 03:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部