ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1157|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG11th-67

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-4 20:35:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG11th-67

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.


(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

疑问:OG答案中说A选项中有incorrect idiom,看解释似乎说的是attribute的用法,但是我没有看出它的用法有错误,请教大家这里的错误指的

是什么呢?

沙发
发表于 2009-2-4 22:55:00 | 只看该作者
A中的in attributing 的主语是the perpetrators  不合逻辑 ;实际上是Defense attorneys attribut
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-4 23:02:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢:)

我知道这个错误点,但是对于OG上给出的答案中的incorrect idiom不甚理解。

我在想是不是some food allergy有问题,用allegy to some food更好

地板
发表于 2009-2-4 23:11:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得这个不应该是最致命的错误点 逻辑错误应该首先考虑到

食物过敏应该是B的用法更好

5#
发表于 2009-2-5 16:39:00 | 只看该作者

 some food allergy
可以理解为某种的食物过敏

或者对某种食物的过敏

有歧异,所以B是对的

当然首先要看的是逻辑错误

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 14:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部