请教Niu Niu们~！

Ricky2835 · 发表于 2012-4-10 16:56:45

小弟请教一下本题答案是C 为什么D E两项不对
OG 语法105：Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefullly coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
A、Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefullly coordinating them with her narratives,
B、in her book illustrations, carefullly coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
C、in her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
D、carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
E、Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefullly coordinated them with her narratives,

mslancaster · 发表于 2012-4-10 20:57:54

E和A犯了同样的them指代错误吧？

OG上咋写的？

D应该是修饰的问题，过去分词coordinated放在BP前面表被动，就把原文的意思变成了是BP被自己carefully coordinated with her narratives了。

这道题考rhetorical construction考的比较变态，是值得多看几遍的题。

Ricky2835 · 发表于 2012-4-10 23:45:03

E的答案是E、Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefullly coordinated them with her narratives and
我选的是E 我觉得用and把两个动词链接起来了
D 选项 OG上面写的是 carefully coordinated 。。。 absurdly modifies Beatrix Potter rather than her book illustrations

mslancaster · 发表于 2012-4-11 14:37:32

D OG上和我之前说的是一样的，真的要挖语法点的话，就是过去分词短语做定语修饰了potter

E有几个问题， in her book illustrations是插入语形式的地点状语，修饰coordinated这个动作发生的位置，是在她写的书里，那么illustrations被作者coordinated with narrtives到illustration里面，不是很awkward么？

Ricky2835 · 发表于 2012-4-11 23:24:40

E 若改成Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations ，which were carefullly coordinated them with her narratives and 是不是就对了？
D为什么 Potter 不能看做为coordinated这个动作的发出者

mslancaster · 发表于 2012-4-12 00:18:54

D里面Poter是这个动作的发出者，但是因为coordinated是过去分词，可以做被动省略形式出现，因此产生的歧义是作者自己把自己coordinated with narratives in her book illustrations去了这样清楚些么？

E改成你说的这样不就没有谓语了嘛

Ricky2835 · 发表于 2012-4-12 19:43:13

D我清楚了 E 我的意思是把Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations which were carefullly coordinated with her narratives ，这样的话会有歧义么？

mslancaster · 发表于 2012-4-12 20:29:08

D我清楚了 E 我的意思是把Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations which were carefullly coordinated with her narratives ，这样的话会有歧义么？

-- by 会员 Ricky2835 (2012/4/12 19:43:13)

D我清楚了 E 我的意思是把Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations which were carefullly coordinated with her narratives ，这样的话会有歧义么？

-- by 会员 Ricky2835 (2012/4/12 19:43:13)

赵丽说过有逗号有which没有逗号没有which，而且我好想也没见过which前面没逗号的，虽然不知道为什么....
而且你E后面要加个谓语出来的

就算这样改语法正确，你不觉得原文的意思被你改变了么？

如果变成 BP, in ...illustrations, which ...., capitalized ....这样又出现了夹心修饰问题。所以还是C最好。

fantasy198 · 发表于 2012-4-13 11:01:30

我想问b 哪里错？

zhongshanlh · 发表于 2012-4-13 14:49:40

发表下对E的个人看法。。。。自己也是怀着自己的疑惑看了好多帖子以后这么想的
其实这个E选项，如果单单是从一个句子的角度来看的，E的语法和逻辑含义角度我个人认为都是没有错误的，Beatrix Potter, in her bookillustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narrativesand capitalized on her keen observation andlove of the natural world.这个句子中BP是主语，后面的coordinated与capitalized是谓语动词，them指代前面的illustrations，没有任何问题，逻辑含义方面，句子的意思为——在书的插图中，BP将插图与她的叙述很好的结合在了一起并且BP利用了她对自然的细致观察和热爱。说会话，单单看这个句子我觉得没有任何问题
但是我们看OG的解释the participial phrase does not clearly modify bookillustrations，OG这么说的意思就是OG从一开始就把coordinate定义为了修饰illustrations的一个过去分词的结构，因此不能把这个过去分词（即非谓语动词与句子本来的谓语动词capitalized用and 并列在一起），我现在是明白OG这么解释的原因了，但是呢，觉得OG这么解释欠缺说服力啊！

没办法，按照OG的解释来看待理解问题吧

D我清楚了 E 我的意思是把Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations which were carefullly coordinated with her narratives ，这样的话会有歧义么？

-- by 会员 Ricky2835 (2012/4/12 19:43:13)

D我清楚了 E 我的意思是把Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations which were carefullly coordinated with her narratives ，这样的话会有歧义么？

-- by 会员 Ricky2835 (2012/4/12 19:43:13)

赵丽说过有逗号有which没有逗号没有which，而且我好想也没见过which前面没逗号的，虽然不知道为什么....
而且你E后面要加个谓语出来的

就算这样改语法正确，你不觉得原文的意思被你改变了么？

如果变成 BP, in ...illustrations, which ...., capitalized ....这样又出现了夹心修饰问题。所以还是C最好。

-- by 会员 mslancaster (2012/4/12 20:29:08)

请教Niu Niu们~！

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()