大家看看，我怎么读的很模糊，这段话．

Some environmentalists question the prudence of
exploiting features of the environment, arguing that
there are no economic benefits to be gained from
forests, mountains, or wetlands that no longer exist.
Many environmentalists claim that because nature
has intrinsic value it would be wrong to destroy such
features of the environment, even if the economic
costs of doing so were outweighed by the economic
costs of not doing so.

这段话让我觉得很糊涂，到底想说什么啊？

有一些环境论者对谨慎的环境地貌的开发有疑问，他们提出：人们不能从已经消失了的热带雨林，山峦，或是湿地中获得任何的经济利益。大部分的环境论者声称，因为大自然有内在的价值，人们破坏环境的地貌是不对的，即使从中得到的利益要大于不开发的利益。

两个门派说法大同小异。因为其最终目的就是为了说明 it would be wrong to destroy such features of the environment。