OG 62 / 65 / 70

问题可能有些多~麻烦各位帮我集中解答一下吧~自己想不通~先谢了O(∩_∩)O~

OG 62

A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

A of B + V 以前问过一道题~ 有位CDer对我讲，V的单复数依随B而变化。当A是the+名词时，V根据A而定。因为the --> 限定 --> 重心。如果此观点成立。同理。这里that的修饰因为amount的前面有了the是不是就应该修饰amount呢？可是旧帖里大家比较认可的观点是that不能跳越修饰，因此这里that修饰PHO。

OG 65

The only way for growers to salvage frozen citrus is to have it quickly processed into juice concentrate before warmer weather returns and rots the fruit

关于E的OG解释：The use of before rather than when also clearly establishes the cause-and-effect relationship between weather and rotting.

Cause-and-effect是因果关系的意思吗？before不是在什么之前发生的意思吗？

OG 70

Displays of the aurora borealis, or “northern lights,” can heat the atmosphere over the Arctic enough to affect the trajectories of ballistic missiles and induce electric currents that can cause blackouts in some areas and corrosion in north-south pipelines.

OG解释：When they are separated only by a comma, the second effect appears to be part of the first one, which is not true.

关于这句话，不太理解。麻烦解释一下。谢谢。

1 that 跳跃能力非常强， 不但能跳OF， 还能跳很多其他介词，    相比之下， ,which最多只能跳of

2 before从句显然比when从句更能体现因果

3 ，inducing，一个结果加一个伴随结果， and induce 表现出的两个不同结果

谢谢MM。

1.麻烦具体解释一下吧。 那这里的that是跳跃修饰吗？这里the amount中的the是 限定词吗？如果这样，还可以条约修饰吗？ 如果这里that 修饰amount 则应该用过去完成时，如果这里that修饰pho则用现在时可以理解。

是否条约修饰是不是还是要在理解句子意思的基础上呢？

2.好吧。第一次知道before体现因果。

3.也就是说inducing可以理解为第一句话的衍生，而and induce 相当于撇开第一部分说另一件事。不知理解对否。谢谢。