ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1085|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]刘振民的《语法改错精解》P115 E7-8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-16 12:21:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]刘振民的《语法改错精解》P115 E7-8

12.The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promotion.
B) quota,having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventually promotion.

D)quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

答案是C),解释说A)、B)和D)中划线部分都是修饰限定quoto,A)还好理解,但是B)和D)为什么不能理解现在分词做伴随结果呢?(主语为it,和C中省略的主语一样)谢谢各位大虾。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-16 13:08:12编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-9-16 15:14:00 | 只看该作者

理解为伴随可以的,但是别人也可以把B,D理解为是The attorney这个主语的伴随呀,这样的话就不对了,也就是我们一直说的歧义了,你这样理解我那样理解。

还有伴随-ing一般有持续延续的意思,这里似乎也不妥。

还有c不是省略主语,是共用主语,是并列。

个人意见,仅供参考哦

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-8-20 00:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部