ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1199|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11请大家帮我分析下

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-14 10:09:00 | 只看该作者

OG11请大家帮我分析下

41. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a conven­tion for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legisla­tures of two-thirds of the states.

(A)             was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B)              was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consider­ation of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C)             was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D)             has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E)              has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amend­ments to the document when formally asked to do so

 答案是E没有错,但不清楚Under a provision of the Constitution that 
      has never been applied. 这个是什么结构阿,修饰CONGRESS吗, 为什么这种结构可以单独一个句子,请教了.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-14 10:20:22编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-8-14 10:43:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得主要是根据后面的so来排除abc的,it指代有问题,再者whereby出现有点改变原意,再看到你说的问题,想一下用has been表示对现在的影响,而如果用过去式只是表示过去的一个动作或结果,和后面感觉时态又有点不太一致,当然了,我也选错了,看了答案觉得应该是这样
板凳
发表于 2008-8-14 11:00:00 | 只看该作者

under a provision ... 是做状语,所以连词whereby就不需要了。

that has never been applied 是定语从句,修饰provision。

个人看法!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-14 11:50:00 | 只看该作者
这个我清楚地,可是,这个是不是介词短语阿,如果是介词短语怎么能独立成句啊.
5#
发表于 2008-8-14 13:22:00 | 只看该作者
Under a provision of the Constitution+THAT引导的修饰CONSTITUTION的定语从句, 大意是在(...样的)宪法的规定下
这个短语在这个句子中应该做状语的功能
举个例子, 跟In this situation, I decided to hold on 里的In this situation在句子结构上起一个作用
6#
发表于 2008-8-14 14:21:00 | 只看该作者

Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied.

大虾们 他问的是 这个最后是个句号不是 逗号 你们说是状语重句,但是它是一个独立的句子 而不是句子中的状语.

我也不明白 为什么是这样的.

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-27 00:24:00 | 只看该作者
对了,我想问的也是这样...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 18:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部