with应该是修饰歧义了,可能修饰gyrfalcon也可能修饰extiction. 至于gyrfalcon with numbers...我认为gyrfalcon with numbers这三个词组成的一个fragment能够逻辑上成立语法上成立就说明了with可以修饰gyrfalcon了,以前对于指代的题目我都是这样子判断的,虽然放到句子里面是不行的。(不知道这个判断方法对不对) --------dividing line---------- 看了紫本OG11的解释让我恍然大悟了,它对OG10的解释进行了大修改。 with短语隔一个逗号前面如果是个名词,也是需要在前面修饰的名词逻辑上不能被修饰才能跳过去当作独立主格,修饰动词或者说subject的。 而这里E的歧义在于,with结构可能会去修饰extinction. 关于OG10里面的说什么可能会跟with extinction并列,个人感觉有点扯蛋,并列是一定要有名词的! 另外可以看一下下面这个题目,with前面是名词,但是还是跳跃修饰动词,with结构做状语的例子: OG 11-78 Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang like socks on a clothesline. (A) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang (B) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs were hanging (C) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging (D) seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging(D) (E) seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs have hung 这个题里,branch是没有arms和legs的,所以一定是跳跃修饰sleeping或者说monkeys的。 ---------------- 这道题目花了我两个多小时...没法活了 |